Partitioning evapotranspiration in sparsely vegetated rangeland using a portable chamber

[1] A portable chamber was used to separate evapotranspiration (ET) from a sparse, mixed-species shrub canopy in southeastern Arizona, United States, into vegetation and soil components. Chamber measurements were made of ET from the five dominant species, and from bare soil, on 3 days during the monsoon season when the soil surface was dry. The chamber measurements were assembled into landscape ET using a simple geometric model of the vegetated land surface. Chamber estimates of landscape ET were well correlated with, but about 26% greater than, simultaneous eddy-correlation measurements. Excessive air speed inside the chamber appears to be the primary cause of the overestimate. Overall, transpiration accounted for 84% of landscape ET, and bare soil evaporation for 16%. Desert zinnia, a small (∼0.1 m high) but abundant species, was the greatest water user, both per unit area of shrub and of landscape. Partitioning of ET into components varied as a function of air temperature and shallow soil moisture. Transpiration from shorter species was more highly correlated with air temperature whereas transpiration from taller species was more highly correlated with shallow soil moisture. Application of these results to a full drying cycle between rainfalls at a similar site suggests that during the monsoon, ET at such sites may be about equally partitioned between transpiration and bare soil evaporation.

[1]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Push broom microwave radiometer observations of surface soil moisture in Monsoon '90 , 1994 .

[2]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from understory species in boreal forest , 2004 .

[3]  E. Small,et al.  Dynamics of evapotranspiration in semiarid grassland and shrubland ecosystems during the summer monsoon season, central New Mexico , 2004 .

[4]  Monique Y. Leclerc,et al.  Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation , 1990 .

[5]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Closed-Chamber Effects on Leaf Temperature, Canopy Photosynthesis, and Evapotranspiration , 1992 .

[6]  D. Stannard USE OF A HEMISPHERICAL CHAMBER FOR MEASUREMENT OF EVAPOTRANSPIRATION , 1988 .

[7]  R. Canfield,et al.  Application of the Line Interception Method in Sampling Range Vegetation , 1941 .

[8]  William E. Reifsnyder,et al.  Radiation geometry in the measurement and interpretation of radiation balance , 1967 .

[9]  P. Jarvis The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[10]  J. Stewart Modelling surface conductance of pine forest , 1988 .

[11]  A. Grau A closed chamber technique for field measurement of gas exchange of forage canopies , 1995 .

[12]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Comparison of alfalfa evapotranspiration measured by a weighing lysimeter and a portable chamber , 1983 .

[13]  Jean L. Steiner,et al.  Bowen ratio, eddy correlation, and portable chamber measurements of sensible and latent heat flux over irrigated spring wheat* , 1991 .

[14]  J. Norman,et al.  Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland , 2000 .

[15]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Regression models for calculating gas fluxes measured with a closed chamber. , 1997, Agronomy journal.

[16]  R. Albrizio,et al.  Automated closed-system canopy-chamber for continuous field-crop monitoring of CO2 and H2O fluxes , 2002 .

[17]  J. P. Decker,et al.  Measuring Transpiration of Undisturbed Tamarisk Shrubs. , 1962, Plant physiology.

[18]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Local energy flux estimates for unstable conditions using variance data in semiarid rangelands , 1994 .

[19]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Calibration and Field Test of Soil Heat Flux Plates1 , 1968 .

[20]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[21]  O. Denmead,et al.  Measuring water use efficiency of Eucalypt trees with chambers and micrometeorological techniques , 1993 .

[22]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Chamber and micrometeorological measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes for three C4 grasses , 1997 .

[23]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Runoff simulation sensitivity to remotely sensed initial soil water content , 1994 .

[24]  W. Oechel,et al.  Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites , 2002 .

[25]  Jerry C. Ritchie,et al.  Comparison of laser and field measurements of vegetation height and canopy cover , 1994 .

[26]  Jerald A. Brotzge,et al.  Examination of the Surface Energy Budget: A Comparison of Eddy Correlation and Bowen Ratio Measurement Systems , 2003 .

[27]  D. Reicosky,et al.  A Portable Chamber for Rapid Evapotranspiration Measurements on Field Plots 1 , 1977, Agronomy Journal.

[28]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Interpretation of surface flux measurements in heterogeneous terrain during the Monsoon '90 experiment , 1994 .

[29]  James W. Jones,et al.  Evaluation of the portable chamber technique for measuring canopy gas exchange by crops , 1993 .

[30]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Preface [to special section on Monsoon '90 Multidisciplinary Experiment] , 1994 .