This study was performed to investigate the fume generation rates (FGRs) and the concentrations of total chromium and hexavalent chromium when stainless steel was welded using flux-cored arc welding (FCAW) with CO2 gas. FGRs and concentrations of total chromium and hexavalent chromium were quantified using a method recommended by the American Welding Society, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (NIOSH Method 7300) and ion chromatography (modified NIOSH Method 7604), respectively. The amount of total fume generated was significantly related to the level of input power. The ranges of FGR were 189-344, 389-698 and 682-1157 mg/min at low, optimal and high input power, respectively. It was found that the FGRs increased with input power by an exponent of 1.19, and increased with current by an exponent of 1.75. The ranges of total chromium fume generation rate (FGRCr) were 3.83-8.27, 12.75-37.25 and 38.79-76.46 mg/min at low, optimal and high input power, respectively. The ranges of hexavalent chromium fume generation rate (FGRCr6+) were 0.46-2.89, 0.76-6.28 and 1.70-11.21 mg/min at low, optimal and high input power, respectively. Thus, hexavalent chromium, which is known to be a carcinogen, generated 1.9 (1.0-2.7) times and 3.7 (2.4-5.0) times as the input power increased from low to optimal and low to high, respectively. As a function of input power, the concentration of total chromium in the fume increased from 1.57-2.65 to 5.45-8.13% while the concentration of hexavalent chromium ranged from 0.15 to 1.08%. The soluble fraction of hexavalent chromium produced by FCAW was approximately 80-90% of total hexavalent chromium. The concentration of total chromium and the solubility of hexavalent chromium were similar to those reported from other studies of shielded metal arc welding fumes, and the concentration of hexavalent chromium was similar to that obtained for metal inert gas-welding fumes.
[1]
Kevin Ashley.
International Standard Procedure for the Extraction of Metal Compounds Having Soluble Threshold Limit Values
,
2001
.
[2]
Winifred G. Palmer.
Effects of Welding on Health IV
,
1983
.
[3]
S. Mortazavi,et al.
The effects of welding parameters on ultra-violet light emissions, ozone and CrVI formation in MIG welding.
,
1997,
The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[4]
R M Stern,et al.
A simple analytical technique for the determination of hexavalent chromium in welding fumes and other complex matrices.
,
1979,
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.
[5]
S. Mortazavi,et al.
REDUCTION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATION IN FUMES FROM METAL CORED ARC WELDING BY ADDITION OF REACTIVE METALS
,
1996
.
[6]
P. Hewitt,et al.
WELDING PROCESS PARAMETERS AND HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM IN MIG FUME
,
1986
.
[7]
U. Ulfvarson.
Survey of air contaminants from welding.
,
1981,
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.
[8]
R M Stern,et al.
Process-dependent risk of delayed health effects for welders.
,
1981,
Environmental health perspectives.
[9]
S. Mortazavi,et al.
Control of occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium and ozone in tubular wire arc-welding processes by replacement of potassium by lithium or by addition of zinc.
,
2002,
The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[10]
Richard Fairfax Cih,et al.
Horizons: TLVs: Soluble and Insoluble Metal Compounds
,
1994
.
[11]
Peter J. Hewitt,et al.
A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO THE CONTROL OF WELDING FUMES AT SOURCE
,
1993
.
[12]
R M Stern,et al.
Some problems in sampling, analysis and evaluation of welding fumes containing Cr(VI).
,
1987,
The Annals of occupational hygiene.