Automated subject-specific, hexahedral mesh generation via image registration.

Generating subject-specific, all-hexahedral meshes for finite element analysis continues to be of significant interest in biomechanical research communities. To date, most automated methods "morph" an existing atlas mesh to match with a subject anatomy, which usually result in degradation in mesh quality because of mesh distortion. We present an automated meshing technique that produces satisfactory mesh quality and accuracy without mesh repair. An atlas mesh is first developed using a script. A subject-specific mesh is generated with the same script after transforming the geometry into the atlas space following rigid image registration, and is transformed back into the subject space. By meshing the brain in 11 subjects, we demonstrate that the technique's performance is satisfactory in terms of both mesh quality (99.5% of elements had a scaled Jacobian >0.6 while <0.01% were between 0 and 0.2) and accuracy (average distance between mesh boundary and geometrical surface was 0.07 mm while <1% greater than 0.5mm). The combined computational cost for image registration and meshing was <4 min. Our results suggest that the technique is effective for generating subject-specific, all-hexahedral meshes and that it may be useful for meshing a variety of anatomical structures across different biomechanical research fields.

[1]  Nicole M. Grosland,et al.  Automated hexahedral meshing of anatomic structures using deformable registration , 2009 .

[2]  M. O’Reilly,et al.  Comparison of Computed Tomography Based Parametric and Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of the Healthy and Metastatic Spine Using a Mesh-Morphing Algorithm , 2008, Spine.

[3]  Roy C. P. Kerckhoffs,et al.  Current progress in patient-specific modeling , 2010, Briefings Bioinform..

[4]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  From medical images to anatomically accurate finite element grids , 2001 .

[6]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  B Melsen,et al.  Strains in periodontal ligament and alveolar bone associated with orthodontic tooth movement analyzed by finite element. , 2009, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[8]  A. Gefen,et al.  Internal mechanical conditions in the soft tissues of a residual limb of a trans-tibial amputee. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Steven E. Benzley,et al.  A Comparison of All Hexagonal and All Tetrahedral Finite Element Meshes for Elastic and Elasto-plastic Analysis , 2011 .

[10]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Brain-skull contact boundary conditions in an inverse computational deformation model , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Yohan Payan,et al.  A fast and robust patient specific Finite Element mesh registration technique: Application to 60 clinical cases , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  Y Payan,et al.  The mesh-matching algorithm: an automatic 3D mesh generator for finite element structures. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Haiying Liu,et al.  Constructing Patient Specific Models for Correcting Intraoperative Brain Deformation , 2001, MICCAI.

[15]  J. D. Hazle,et al.  Computational Modeling and Real-Time Control of Patient-Specific Laser Treatment of Cancer , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Patient-specific modeling of cardiovascular mechanics. , 2009, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[17]  David Gavaghan,et al.  Multi-scale computational modelling in biology and physiology , 2007, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology.

[18]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  J. Weiss,et al.  Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[20]  Nielen Stander,et al.  A method for automatically optimizing medical devices for treating heart failure: designing polymeric injection patterns. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Joseph T. Gwin,et al.  HEAD IMPACT SEVERITY MEASURES FOR EVALUATING MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY RISK EXPOSURE , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[22]  M. Alexandra Schönning,et al.  Hexahedral mesh development of free-formed geometry: The human femur exemplified , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[23]  Ian A Sigal,et al.  Morphing methods to parameterize specimen-specific finite element model geometries. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Ian A Sigal,et al.  Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Patrick M. Knupp,et al.  Algebraic Mesh Quality Metrics , 2001, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[26]  J. Sweeney,et al.  White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Adam C. Woodbury,et al.  Adaptive mesh coarsening for quadrilateral and hexahedral meshes , 2010 .