Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies

Our study, spanning 15 individuals and over 1,200 samples, provides our most comprehensive view to date of storage and stabilization effects on stool. We tested five methods for preserving human and dog fecal specimens for periods of up to 8 weeks, including the types of variation often encountered under field conditions, such as freeze-thaw cycles and high temperature fluctuations. We show that several cost-effective methods provide excellent microbiome stability out to 8 weeks, opening up a range of field studies with humans and wildlife that would otherwise be cost-prohibitive. ABSTRACT Immediate freezing at −20°C or below has been considered the gold standard for microbiome preservation, yet this approach is not feasible for many field studies, ranging from anthropology to wildlife conservation. Here we tested five methods for preserving human and dog fecal specimens for periods of up to 8 weeks, including such types of variation as freeze-thaw cycles and the high temperature fluctuations often encountered under field conditions. We found that three of the methods—95% ethanol, FTA cards, and the OMNIgene Gut kit—can preserve samples sufficiently well at ambient temperatures such that differences at 8 weeks are comparable to differences among technical replicates. However, even the worst methods, including those with no fixative, were able to reveal microbiome differences between species at 8 weeks and between individuals after a week, allowing meta-analyses of samples collected using various methods when the effect of interest is expected to be larger than interindividual variation (although use of a single method within a study is strongly recommended to reduce batch effects). Encouragingly for FTA cards, the differences caused by this method are systematic and can be detrended. As in other studies, we strongly caution against the use of 70% ethanol. The results, spanning 15 individuals and over 1,200 samples, provide our most comprehensive view to date of storage effects on stool and provide a paradigm for the future studies of other sample types that will be required to provide a global view of microbial diversity and its interaction among humans, animals, and the environment. IMPORTANCE Our study, spanning 15 individuals and over 1,200 samples, provides our most comprehensive view to date of storage and stabilization effects on stool. We tested five methods for preserving human and dog fecal specimens for periods of up to 8 weeks, including the types of variation often encountered under field conditions, such as freeze-thaw cycles and high temperature fluctuations. We show that several cost-effective methods provide excellent microbiome stability out to 8 weeks, opening up a range of field studies with humans and wildlife that would otherwise be cost-prohibitive.

[1]  Jianxin Shi,et al.  Collecting Fecal Samples for Microbiome Analyses in Epidemiology Studies , 2015, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[2]  J. Choo,et al.  Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[3]  S. Menke,et al.  Shifts in the gut microbiome observed in wildlife faecal samples exposed to natural weather conditions: lessons from time‐series analyses using next‐generation sequencing for application in field studies , 2015 .

[4]  N. Fierer,et al.  Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 Evidence-based Recommendations on Storing and Handling Specimens for Analyses of Insect Microbiota , 2022 .

[5]  R. Knight,et al.  Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks. , 2015, Journal of microbiological methods.

[6]  Rob Knight,et al.  The microbiome of uncontacted Amerindians , 2015, Science Advances.

[7]  Ó. O’Sullivan,et al.  The Effects of Freezing on Faecal Microbiota as Determined Using MiSeq Sequencing and Culture-Based Investigations , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  C. Huttenhower,et al.  Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Se Jin Song,et al.  Convergence of gut microbiomes in myrmecophagous mammals , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[10]  R. Hayes,et al.  Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection , 2014, BMC Microbiology.

[11]  K. Petrželková,et al.  Evaluation of different storage methods to characterize the fecal bacterial communities of captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). , 2012, Journal of microbiological methods.

[12]  Katherine H. Huang,et al.  Structure, Function and Diversity of the Healthy Human Microbiome , 2012, Nature.

[13]  T. R. Licht,et al.  Freezing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction affects the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio determined by downstream quantitative PCR analysis. , 2012, FEMS microbiology letters.

[14]  J. Clemente,et al.  Diet Drives Convergence in Gut Microbiome Functions Across Mammalian Phylogeny and Within Humans , 2011, Science.

[15]  Rob Knight,et al.  Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samples. , 2010, FEMS microbiology letters.

[16]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[17]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package , 2008 .

[18]  R. Knight,et al.  Evolution of Mammals and Their Gut Microbes , 2008, Science.

[19]  R. Knight,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative β Diversity Measures Lead to Different Insights into Factors That Structure Microbial Communities , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  R. Knight,et al.  UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  J. R. King,et al.  Recommendations on the use of alcohols for preservation of ant specimens (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) , 2004, Insectes Sociaux.