Effects of administrative ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses

This study investigated, under real-world conditions, whether a statewide 2-year administrative ignition interlock license restriction program in Maryland was effective in reducing subsequent alcohol-related traffic violations among multiple offenders and whether any reductions in recidivism could be maintained after the program ended and interlock license restrictions were removed. A total of 1,927 drivers eligible for relicensure were randomly assigned to either the 2-year interlock license restriction program or the normal and customary sanctions afforded multiple offenders in Maryland. Recidivism was defined as incurring a subsequent alcohol-impaired driving violation during the 2-year intervention or 2-year postintervention periods. Compared to the control group, participation in the interlock license restriction program reduced drivers’ hazard (or risk) of a subsequent alcohol-impaired driving offense by a statistically significant 36% during the 2-year intervention, 26% during the 2-year postintervention period, and 32% during the entire 4-year study period. This investigation of interlock program effectiveness is the first to report significantly lower recidivism among the interlock group than its control group after the ignition interlock license restriction program ended. Possible reasons for this novel finding and areas for future research are discussed.

[1]  Robert B. Voas,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE WEST VIRGINIA INTERLOCK PROGRAM ON SECOND DRUNK-DRIVING OFFENDERS , 1997 .

[2]  P R Marques,et al.  The Alberta Interlock Program: the evaluation of a province-wide program on DUI recidivism. , 1999, Addiction.

[3]  A. Williams,et al.  Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: a randomized trial in Maryland. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[4]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[5]  Bo Bjerre.  Primary and secondary prevention of drink driving by the use of alcolock device and program: Swedish experiences. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Roy E Lucke,et al.  Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices: Controlling the Recidivist , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  P. Gruenewald,et al.  Drinking and driving: drinking patterns and drinking problems. , 1996, Addiction.

[8]  P L Remington,et al.  A sobering perspective on a lower blood alcohol limit. , 1986, JAMA.

[9]  G. Tarde.  The Laws of Imitation , 2009 .

[10]  C H Wiliszowski,et al.  Determine reasons for repeat drinking and driving , 1996 .

[11]  Robert B. Voas,et al.  Key Features for Ignition Interlock Programs , 2010 .

[12]  J R Stewart,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERLOCK IN PREVENTING RECIDIVISM IN A POPULATION OF MULTIPLE DWI OFFENDERS , 1992 .

[13]  W Vanlaar,et al.  An investigation of the usefulness, the acceptability and impact on lifestyle of alcohol ignition interlocks in drink-driving offenders , 2008 .

[14]  Richard Roth,et al.  Mandating Interlocks for Fully Revoked Offenders: The New Mexico Experience , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[15]  Mwb Perrine.  WHO ARE THE DRINKING DRIVERS? THE SPECTRUM OF DRINKING DRIVERS REVISITED , 1990 .

[16]  B. Skinner.  Is it behaviorism? , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  S A Ferguson,et al.  THE ROLE OF PASSIVE ALCOHOL SENSORS IN DETECTING ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVERS AT SOBRIETY CHECKPOINTS , 1995 .

[18]  Bo Bjerre,et al.  Positive health-care effects of an alcohol ignition interlock programme among driving while impaired (DWI) offenders. , 2007, Addiction.

[19]  D A Dawson,et al.  Alternative definitions of high risk for impaired driving: the overlap of high volume, frequent heavy drinking and alcohol dependence. , 1999, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[20]  J. Goldberg.  Economic impact of motor vehicle crashes. , 2002, Annals of Emergency Medicine.

[21]  Bo Bjerre,et al.  An Evaluation of the Swedish Ignition Interlock Program , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[22]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[23]  R. Voas.  Have the courts and the motor vehicle departments adequate power to control the hard-core drunk driver? , 2001, Addiction.

[24]  John H. Lacey,et al.  STATE OF KNOWLEDGE OF ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVING: RESEARCH ON REPEAT DWI OFFENDERS , 2000 .

[25]  A Scott Tippetts,et al.  Evaluation of a program to motivate impaired driving offenders to install ignition interlocks. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Richard Roth,et al.  Interlocks for First Offenders: Effective? , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[27]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[28]  Jeffrey A. Bouffard,et al.  Investigating the impact of extended bar closing times on police stops for DUI , 2007 .

[29]  Ronald L. Akers,et al.  Deviant behavior;: A social learning approach , 1973 .

[30]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  Assessing Correctional Rehabilitation : Policy , Practice , and Prospects by , 2000 .

[31]  David J DeYoung.  An evaluation of the implementation of ignition interlock in California. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[32]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Attitudes Toward In-Vehicle Advanced Alcohol Detection Technology , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[33]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[34]  A. Mcknight.  Server intervention: Accomplishments and needs. , 1993 .

[35]  Bo Bjerre,et al.  Is an alcohol ignition interlock programme a useful tool for changing the alcohol and driving habits of drink-drivers? , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  D. Bereczki,et al.  The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2003 .

[37]  Edwin D. Mares,et al.  On S , 1994, Stud Logica.

[38]  M. Felson,et al.  Crime and Everyday Life , 1998 .

[39]  B D Caudill,et al.  Driving while intoxicated: increased deterrence or alternative transportation for the drunk driver. , 1990, Journal of substance abuse.

[40]  W D Glauz,et al.  Probability of arrest while driving under the influence of alcohol , 2000, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[41]  A K Lund,et al.  DETECTION OF ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVERS USING A PASSIVE ALCOHOL SENSOR , 1985 .

[42]  M. Wasserman,et al.  Guide to community preventive services: state and local opportunities for tobacco use reduction. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[43]  J M Lachin,et al.  Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[44]  Scott V. Masten,et al.  An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock in California , 2004 .

[45]  Bo Bjerre,et al.  A Swedish alcohol ignition interlock programme for drink-drivers: effects on hospital care utilization and sick leave. , 2007, Addiction.

[46]  R. Kay.  The Analysis of Survival Data , 2012 .

[47]  James H. Hedlund,et al.  Reducing Impaired-Driving Recidivism Using Advanced Vehicle-Based Alcohol Detection Systems: A Report to Congress , 2007 .

[48]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[49]  R B Voas,et al.  Deterring the drinking driver: the Stockton experience. , 1987, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[50]  P. Zador,et al.  Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: an update using 1996 data. , 2000, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[51]  R Hingson.  STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH THE PERSISTENT DRINKING DRIVER. APPENDIX C: WORKSHOP BACKGROUND PAPERS. C3. ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES TO REDUCE CHRONIC DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED , 1995 .