Clinical Results and MRI Evolution of a Nano-Composite Multilayered Biomaterial for Osteochondral Regeneration at 5 Years

Background: Several cartilage lesions involve the subchondral bone, and there is a need for biphasic scaffolds to treat the entire osteochondral unit to reproduce the different biological and functional requirements and guide the growth of the 2 tissues. Purpose: To evaluate the results of a cell-free collagen-hydroxyapatite osteochondral scaffold at midterm, and to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis to document the imaging evolution of the tissue regeneration process through 5 years of follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Twenty-seven patients (9 women, 18 men; mean age, 34.9 ± 10.2 years) treated for knee chondral or osteochondral lesions (size, 1.5-6 cm2) were followed for 2 and 5 years and were clinically evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner scores. An MRI evaluation was performed at both follow-ups in 23 lesions, and the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score and specific subchondral bone parameters (bone regeneration, bone signal quality, osteophytes or upcoming bone front, sclerotic areas, and edema) were analyzed. Results: A statistically significant improvement in all clinical scores was observed from the initial evaluation to the 2- and 5-year follow-ups, and the results were stable over time. The mean IKDC subjective score improved from 40.0 ± 15.0 to 76.5 ± 14.5 (2-year follow-up) and 77.1 ± 18.0 (5-year follow-up) and the mean Tegner score from 1.6 ± 1.1 to 4.0 ± 1.8 (2-year follow-up) and 4.1 ± 1.9 (5-year follow-up). The MRI evaluation showed a significant improvement in both the MOCART score and subchondral bone status from 2 to 5 years. At 5 years, complete filling of the cartilage was shown in 78.3% of the lesions, complete integration of the graft was detected in 69.6% of cases, the repair tissue surface was intact in 60.9%, and the structure of the repair tissue was homogeneous in 60.9% of the cases. No correlation was found between MRI findings and clinical outcome. Conclusion: This osteochondral scaffold was used for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral knee defects with a single-step procedure. The study results highlighted the safety and potential of this procedure, which offered a good clinical outcome with stable results at midterm follow-up. Although the MRI findings improved over time, some abnormalities persisted, but no correlation was found between the imaging and clinical results.

[1]  J. Tarlton,et al.  International Cartilage Repair Society , 2011 .

[2]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Novel nanostructured scaffold for osteochondral regeneration: pilot study in horses , 2010, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[3]  Dietmar W Hutmacher,et al.  Biomaterials/scaffolds. Design of bioactive, multiphasic PCL/collagen type I and type II-PCL-TCP/collagen composite scaffolds for functional tissue engineering of osteochondral repair tissue by using electrospinning and FDM techniques. , 2007, Methods in molecular medicine.

[4]  Jörg Haller,et al.  Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[5]  René Verdonk,et al.  A pilot study of the use of an osteochondral scaffold plug for cartilage repair in the knee and how to deal with early clinical failures. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  W. Dockery,et al.  A computed tomography scan assessment of synthetic multiphase polymer scaffolds used for osteochondral defect repair. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[7]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Platelet autologous growth factors decrease the osteochondral regeneration capability of a collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold in a sheep model , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[8]  A. Schulz,et al.  Mid-term results of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for treatment of focal cartilage defects in the knee , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Unicompartmental osteoarthritis: an integrated biomechanical and biological approach as alternative to metal resurfacing , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  Riley J. Williams,et al.  Articular cartilage repair using a resorbable matrix scaffold. , 2008, Instructional course lectures.

[11]  Ching-Chuan Jiang,et al.  Repair of porcine articular cartilage defect with a biphasic osteochondral composite , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  M. Carmont,et al.  Delayed incorporation of a TruFit plug: perseverance is recommended. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  R. Ciatti,et al.  Treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee joint using a modified AMIC technique , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  Neil Rushton,et al.  Evaluation of early-stage osteochondral defect repair using a biphasic scaffold based on a collagen-glycosaminoglycan biopolymer in a caprine model. , 2012, The Knee.

[15]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Midterm Results of a Combined Biological and Mechanical Approach for the Treatment of a Complex Knee Lesion , 2012, Cartilage.

[16]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Second-generation autologous chondrocyte transplantation: MRI findings and clinical correlations at a minimum 5-year follow-up. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[17]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Scaffold-based repair for cartilage healing: a systematic review and technical note. , 2013, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[18]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Design of graded biomimetic osteochondral composite scaffolds. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[19]  M. Reverte-Vinaixa,et al.  Synthetic Resorbable Scaffolds for the Treatment of Isolated Patellofemoral Cartilage Defects in Young Patients , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  H. S. Azevedo,et al.  Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  Andreas H. Gomoll,et al.  The subchondral bone in articular cartilage repair: current problems in the surgical management , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[22]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Orderly osteochondral regeneration in a sheep model using a novel nano‐composite multilayered biomaterial , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  N. Caplan,et al.  Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries , 2014 .

[24]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Treatment of Knee Osteochondritis Dissecans With a Cell-Free Biomimetic Osteochondral Scaffold , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[25]  G. Verbruggen,et al.  Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis combined with platelet-rich plasma gel: technical description and a five pilot patients report , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[26]  A. Cossey,et al.  TruFit CB® bone plug: chondral repair, scaffold design, surgical technique and early experiences , 2010, Expert Review of Medical Devices.

[27]  H. Madry,et al.  Disease-specific clinical problems associated with the subchondral bone , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[28]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Novel Nano-composite Multilayered Biomaterial for Osteochondral Regeneration , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[29]  M. Vasso,et al.  The Manangement of Knee Cartilage Defects with Modified Amic Technique: Preliminary Results , 2011, International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology.

[30]  A. Hernández,et al.  Repair of an osteochondral defect by sustained delivery of BMP‐2 or TGFβ1 from a bilayered alginate–PLGA scaffold , 2012, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[31]  H. Potter,et al.  The Maturation of Synthetic Scaffolds for Osteochondral Donor Sites of the Knee , 2010, Cartilage.

[32]  M. Marcacci,et al.  New trends for knee cartilage regeneration: from cell-free scaffolds to mesenchymal stem cells , 2012, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

[33]  C. Kaps,et al.  Repair of a post-traumatic cartilage defect with a cell-free polymer-based cartilage implant: a follow-up at two years by MRI and histological review. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[34]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Novel nano-composite multi-layered biomaterial for the treatment of multifocal degenerative cartilage lesions , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[35]  Nora T. Khanarian,et al.  A functional agarose-hydroxyapatite scaffold for osteochondral interface regeneration. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[36]  Herwig Imhof,et al.  Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[37]  M Busacca,et al.  A novel nano-composite multi-layered biomaterial for treatment of osteochondral lesions: technique note and an early stability pilot clinical trial. , 2010, Injury.

[38]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reliable in Predicting Clinical Outcome After Articular Cartilage Repair of the Knee? , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.