All sociological/anthropological research (network or otherwise) in organizations (particularly corporations) is complicated by the need to obtain consent not only from the potential respondent but from the organization itself. Whereas in ordinary research there are essentially two parties that must come to agreement – the researcher and the respondent – in the organizational research there are three. In addition, the fact of organizational hierarchy means that the employee’s participation in the research entails considerably more risk than in other situations. At the same time, social network research involves special challenges due to the lack of anonymity at the questionnaire level and the sensitivity of some of the questions. This paper seeks to lay out some of the issues and to propose a set of standard guidelines for ethical research on networks in organizations. It is hoped that developing a set of standard guidelines and forms will help Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to allow network research. Examples of proposed forms are included as appendices. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
[1]
C. Argyris,et al.
Argyris, Chris, Robert Putnam, and Diane Maclain Smith, Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention . San Franciso: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
,
1985
.
[2]
S. Borgatti,et al.
Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration
,
2002
.
[3]
Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.
Ethical and Strategic Issues in Organizational Social Network Analysis
,
2003
.
[4]
Kelly Clark Keefe,et al.
Degrees of Separation An Ourstory About Working-Class and Poverty-Class Academic Identity
,
2006
.
[5]
D. Dillman.
Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method
,
1979
.