Of pages and paddles: Children's expectations and mistaken interactions with physical-digital tools

An assumption behind new interface approaches that employ physical means of interaction is that these can leverage users' prior knowledge from the real world, making them intuitive or 'natural' to use. This paper presents a user study of Tangible Augmented Reality, which shows that physical input tools can invite a wide variety of interaction behaviours and raise unmatched expectations about how to interact. Children played with interactive sequences in an augmented book using physical paddles to control the main characters. Our analysis focuses on how knowledge and skills that children have from the physical world succeed or fail to apply in the interaction with this application. We found that children expected the digital augmentations to behave and react analogous to physical 3D objects, encouraged by the ability to act in 3D space and the (digital) visual feedback. The affordances of the paddles as physical interaction devices invited actions that the system could not detect or interpret. In effect, children often struggled to understand what it was in their actions that made the system react.

[1]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[2]  William Buxton,et al.  Graspable user interfaces , 1996 .

[3]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Designing augmented reality interfaces , 2005, COMG.

[4]  S. M. Hansen Where the action is. , 1985, Journal (National Association for Hospital Development (U.S.)).

[5]  Masa Inakage,et al.  Little red: storytelling in mixed reality , 2003, SIGGRAPH '03.

[6]  Matthias Rauterberg,et al.  Natural User Interfaces (NUI): A Case Study of a Video Based Interaction Technique for CAD Systems , 1997, HCI.

[7]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  An Observational Study of Children Interacting with an Augmented Story Book , 2007, Edutainment.

[8]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[9]  F. Townsend New horizons , 1943 .

[10]  Roy Want,et al.  Embodied user interfaces for really direct manipulation , 2000, CACM.

[11]  Kenneth P. Fishkin,et al.  A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[12]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  The MagicBook - Moving Seamlessly between Reality and Virtuality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[14]  Marek Hatala,et al.  ec(h)o: situated play in a tangible and audio museum guide , 2006, DIS '06.

[15]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[16]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[17]  David J. Chatting Action and reaction for physical map interfaces , 2008, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[18]  Miguel Bruns Alonso,et al.  Squeeze, rock, and roll; can tangible interaction with affective products support stress reduction? , 2008, TEI.

[19]  Vesna Popovic,et al.  The Nature of Intuitive Use of Products: An Experimental Approach , 2003 .

[20]  Families. Department for Children, Schools and Families , 2007 .

[21]  Colin Ware,et al.  Exploration and virtual camera control in virtual three dimensional environments , 1990, I3D '90.

[22]  Orit Shaer,et al.  Reality-based interaction: unifying the new generation of interaction styles , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[23]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  The reification of metaphor as a design tool , 2006, TCHI.

[24]  Mikael B. Skov,et al.  Comparison of think-aloud and constructive interaction in usability testing with children , 2005, IDC '05.

[25]  Robert McCartney,et al.  Making it Real , 2008, JERC.

[26]  Yu Li,et al.  An interactive 3D exploration narrative interface for storytelling , 2004, IDC '04.

[27]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[28]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible User Interfaces , 2006 .

[29]  Leena Norros,et al.  Affordance Table - A Collaborative Smart Interface for Process Control , 2007, HCI.

[30]  J. Westbrook,et al.  The National Literacy Strategy , 2003 .

[31]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  The Magic Book: An interface that moves seamlessly between reality and virtuality , 2001 .

[32]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Affordance-Based Design of Physical Interfaces for Ubiquitous Environments , 2006, UCS.

[33]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[34]  William W. Gaver Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[35]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection in play , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Augmenting the science centre and museum experience , 2004, GRAPHITE '04.

[37]  Donald A. Norman The next UI breakthrough, part 2: physicality , 2007, INTR.

[38]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Book Review: Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction, Paul Dourish, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001, 256 pp. ISBN 0-262-04196-0 , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[39]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[40]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Lessons from an AR book study , 2007, TEI.