When UV Meets Fresh Water

Ultraviolet radiation has detrimental and beneficial effects in freshwater ecosystems. Ultraviolet radiation (UV)—the shortest-wavelength, highest-energy solar radiation that passes through the atmosphere—is a potent force affecting life on Earth. Exposure to UV, which reaches Earth's surface at wavelengths between 290 and 400 nm, can damage DNA and impair an organism's ability to reproduce, sense its environment, and resist disease. Ozone concentrated in the stratosphere shields living organisms from the most damaging wavelengths of UV, known as UV-B (280 to 320 nm). In the 1980s and 1990s, observations that this protective layer was becoming depleted, and that a seasonal ozone “hole” over the Antarctic was expanding, generated serious concerns about the potential negative effects of increased UV on aquatic ecosystems (1). More recently, however, it has become clear that even the shortest-wavelength, highest-energy UV reaching Earth has beneficial as well as detrimental effects on individual organisms and thus on natural ecosystems (2).

[1]  Min Shao,et al.  Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: Progress report, 2004 , 2005, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[2]  Guy Wallis,et al.  A Species of Reef Fish that Uses Ultraviolet Patterns for Covert Face Recognition , 2010, Current Biology.

[3]  Ultraviolet radiation affects invasibility of lake ecosystems by warm-water fish. , 2010, Ecology.

[4]  R. Hesslein,et al.  Long‐term patterns of dissolved organic carbon in lakes across eastern Canada: Evidence of a pronounced climate effect , 2010 .

[5]  K. Rose,et al.  Differences in UV transparency and thermal structure between alpine and subalpine lakes: implications for organisms , 2009, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[6]  UV‐enhanced fish predation and the differential migration of zooplankton to UV radiation and fish , 2009 .

[7]  K. Rose,et al.  Patterns of spatial and temporal variability of UV transparency in Lake Tahoe, California‐Nevada , 2009 .

[8]  R. McKenzie,et al.  UV Radiation: Balancing Risks and Benefits † , 2009, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[9]  M. Schneider,et al.  Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish , 2008, Nature.

[10]  Sandra L. Cooke,et al.  Effects of temperature and ultraviolet radiation on diel vertical migration of freshwater crustacean zooplankton , 2008 .

[11]  Paul Monis,et al.  Solar UV reduces Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst infectivity in environmental waters , 2008, Journal of applied microbiology.

[12]  C. Williamson,et al.  Artificial UV-B and solar radiation reduce in vitro infectivity of the human pathogen Cryptosporidium parvum. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  J. R. Stauffer,et al.  Photopigment spectral absorbance of Lake Malawi cichlids , 2006 .

[14]  A. Kodric‐Brown,et al.  Ultraviolet reflectance patterns of male guppies enhance their attractiveness to females , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  L. Roberts Does the Ozone Hole Threaten Antarctic Life?: Early evidence is just coming in; so far, the answer is far from clear and investigators are divided. , 1989, Science.