QoS based evaluation of routing protocols in WSN

The demand of electronic gadgets such as electronic tablets, mobile phones, GPS devices, and smart computing devices is gaining a lot of popularity these days. The demand for these devices has also increased as these devices have made it easy to perform everyday needs in a mobile and distributed way. With the rise in the requirement of these devices they have become cheap in cost and there has been increase in the demand for communication and networking among wireless devices. In this scenario, the evolution of the Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is fundamentally towards the universality of computing devices. Nowadays sensor nodes are having the capability of sensing and performing data processing in various types of environmental conditions. These sensor nodes are usually available in small size and are cheap in cost. In WSN, the storage capabilities of sensor nodes, their transmission range and processing capabilities are limited. Also, their energy resources are limited. Routing protocols play the crucial role of maintaining the routes in the network, ensuring reliable multi-hop communication in these conditions. This paper presents the analysis of the existing routing protocols to ensure which routing protocol provides a better Quality of Service guarantee. The Quality of Service guaranteed by a routing protocol is analyzed by using different quality of service metrics namely packet delivery ratio, throughput and end to end delay. Also the energy efficiency of the protocols is taken into consideration.

[1]  K MarinaMahesh,et al.  Ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing , 2002 .

[2]  Luigi Paura,et al.  M-DART: multi-path dynamic address routing , 2011, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[3]  Zygmunt J. Haas,et al.  On the impact of alternate path routing for load balancing in mobile ad hoc networks , 2000, 2000 First Annual Workshop on Mobile and Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. MobiHOC (Cat. No.00EX444).

[4]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Wireless sensor network survey , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[5]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  Scalable ad hoc routing: the case for dynamic addressing , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[6]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  An implementation study of the AODV routing protocol , 2000, 2000 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00TH8540).

[7]  Samir R. Das,et al.  Ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing: Research Articles , 2006 .

[8]  Puliu Yan,et al.  Similar node-disjoint multi-paths routing in wireless ad hoc networks , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2005..

[9]  Samir R Das,et al.  Ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing , 2002, MOCO.

[10]  Hua Zhang,et al.  Cluster Heads Election Analysis for Multi-hop Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Weighted Graph and Particle Swarm Optimization , 2008, 2008 Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation.

[11]  Peter E. Sholander,et al.  On the impact of alternate path routing for load balancing in mobile ad hoc networks , 2000, MobiHoc.

[12]  Samir Ranjan Das,et al.  Performance of Multipath Routing for On-Demand Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2001, Mob. Networks Appl..

[13]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2004, Mob. Networks Appl..

[14]  Öznur Özkasap,et al.  Ad-Hoc Networks , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.