Fetal Biometry: Clinical, Pathological, and Technical Considerations

Sonographic measurements of fetal ultrasound parameters are the basis for accurate determination of gestational age and detection of fetal growth abnormalities. Selection of the most useful single biometric parameter depends on the timing and purpose of measurement and is influenced by specific limitations. CRL (crown-rump length) is the best parameter for early dating of pregnancy. Biparietal diameter (BPD) maintains the closest correlation with gestational age in the second trimester. In cases of variation in the shape of the skull, head circumference is an effective alternative. Abdominal circumference is the most useful dimension to evaluate fetal growth, and femur length is the best parameter in the evaluation of skeletal dysplasia. Use of multiple predictors improves the accuracy of estimates. An individual approach to each pregnancy is recommended for fetal growth assessment. The various epidemiological factors involved in fetal growth should be considered and specific charts for different communities should be used when possible. The methods of fetal weight estimation with their limitations and potential errors are presented. Clinical application of fetal biometry in abnormal growth is discussed in cases of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses, chromosomal aberrations, and skeletal dysplasias. Target Audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to describe the usefulness of fetal biometry in gestational-age assessment and estimation of fetal weight, to delineate the application of fetal biometry in the evaluation of abnormal fetal growth, and to list the most accurate measurements for predicting gestational age.

[1]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  B. Barton,et al.  Sonar biparietal diameter. II. Predictive of three fetal growth patterns leading to a closer assessment of gestational age and neonatal weight. , 1976, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  L. Lubchenco,et al.  Intrauterine growth in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks. , 1966, Pediatrics.

[4]  W. Ott The diagnosis of altered fetal growth. , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[5]  S. Kjos,et al.  The accuracy of intrapartum ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  R. Sabbagha,et al.  Diagnostic ultrasound applied to obstetrics and gynecology , 1980 .

[7]  H. Thaler,et al.  How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age? , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  K. Benirschke,et al.  Neonatal deaths among infants of diabetic mothers. Postmortem findings in ninety-five infants. , 1960, American journal of diseases of children.

[9]  D. Gray,et al.  Fetal Biometry as a Screening Tool for the Detection of Chromosomally Abnormal Pregnancies , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  I. Pryce Prediction of birthweight by fetal ultrasound biometry. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  S. Campbell,et al.  The assessment of fetal development by diagnostic ultrasound. , 1974, Clinics in perinatology.

[12]  J. Keller,et al.  Infants of diabetic mothers with accelerated fetal growth by ultrasonography: are they all alike? , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  S. Campbell,et al.  Routine Ultrasound Screening for Antenatal Detection of Intrauterine Growth Retardation , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  M. Divon,et al.  Underestimation of fetal weight in premature rupture of membranes. , 1984, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[15]  D. Guzick,et al.  The Sonographic Assessment of Twin Growth Discordancy , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  F. Battaglia,et al.  A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. , 1967, The Journal of pediatrics.

[17]  R. Filly,et al.  Prediction of intrauterine growth retardation by sonographic estimation of total intrauterine volume , 1981, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[18]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Reduction of False‐Positive Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction by Application of Customized Fetal Growth Standards , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  Wansu Chen,et al.  Estimating fetal weight in the management of macrosomia. , 2000, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[20]  B. Metzger,et al.  Serial ultrasonography to assess evolving fetal macrosomia. Studies in 23 pregnant diabetic women. , 1980, JAMA.

[21]  D. Guzick,et al.  Fetal radius length: a critical evaluation of race as a factor in gestational age assessment. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  C. Cox,et al.  Incorporating sonographic cheek‐to‐cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus , 1997, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[23]  J. Toohey,et al.  Does amniotic fluid index affect the accuracy of estimated fetal weight in preterm premature rupture of membranes? , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  J. Rodis,et al.  Gender-specific second-trimester biometry. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  G. Turner Recognition of intrauterine growth retardation by considering comparative birth-weights. , 1971, Lancet.

[26]  F. Chang,et al.  Predicting birth weight by fetal upper-arm volume with use of three-dimensional ultrasonography. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  How accurate is second trimester fetal dating? , 1991, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[28]  H. Wallenburg,et al.  Ultrasonic Diagnosis of the Large-for-Dates Infant , 1978, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  A. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Estimation of fetal weight in twins: a new mathematical model , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[30]  P. Rosati,et al.  Transvaginal fetal biometry in early pregnancy. , 1997, Early Human Development.

[31]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  An evaluation of two methods for measuring fetal head and body circumferences. , 1982, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[32]  G. MacKenzie,et al.  THE ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL CROWN‐RUMP LENGTH AS A METHOD OF ASSESSING GESTATIONAL AGE , 1976, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[33]  A. Kurjak,et al.  Biometric and dynamic ultrasound assessment of small-for-dates infants: report of 260 cases. , 1980, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  C. Combs,et al.  Sonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight Based on a Model of Fetal Volume , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  F. Chang,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Ultrasound‐Assessed Fetal Thigh Volumetry in Predicting Birth Weight , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Prediction of intrauterine growth retardation by determination of total intrauterine volume. , 1977, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[37]  R J Carpenter,et al.  Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  A date-independent predictor of intrauterine growth retardation: femur length/abdominal circumference ratio. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  G. Kissling,et al.  Ultrasonic Recognition of the Small‐for‐Gestational‐Age Fetus , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  R. Geirsson,et al.  Ultrasound instead of last menstrual period as the basis of gestational age assignment , 1991, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[41]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Fetal Femur Length: A Critical Reevaluation of the Relationship to Menstrual Age , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[42]  A. Cartin,et al.  Estimation of fetal weight: mean value from multiple formulas. , 1999, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[43]  L. Gonçalves,et al.  Fetal biometry of skeletal dysplasias: a multicentric study. , 1994, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[44]  H. Rockette,et al.  Sonar BPD and Fetal Age: Definition of the Relationship , 1974, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[45]  J. Minogue,et al.  Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[46]  G. Ludwig,et al.  The Velocity of Sound through Tissues and the Acoustic Impedance of Tissues , 1950 .

[47]  J. Hardin,et al.  The utility of fetal biometry as an adjunct to the multiple-marker screening test for Down syndrome. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[48]  F. A. Korndorffer,et al.  Fetal weight estimates in late pregnancy with emphasis on macrosomia , 1986, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[49]  C. Lockwood,et al.  Accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in multiple pregnancies , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[50]  J. Deutinger,et al.  Fetal Sonographic Biometry: A Guide to Normal and Abnormal Measurements , 1997 .

[51]  J C Morrison,et al.  Limitations of Clinical and Sonographic Estimates of Birth Weight: Experience With 1034 Parturients , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[52]  J. Queenan,et al.  Growth of the ultrasound fetal femur length during normal pregnancy. Part I. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[53]  J. Hobbins,et al.  The neonatal bisacromial diameter: a prenatal sonographic evaluation , 1997, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[54]  D. Nochimson,et al.  Value of Fetal Ponderal Index in Predicting Growth Retardation , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[55]  S. Myers,et al.  A Population Study of the Relationship Between Fetal Death and Altered Fetal Growth , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[56]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Fetal biparietal diameter: rational choice of plane of section for sonographic measurement. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[57]  M. Mongelli Fetal weight estimation by symphysis-fundus height and gestational age. , 1997, Gynecologic and obstetric investigation.

[58]  R. Sabbagha,et al.  Sonar biparietal diameter. I. Analysis of percentile growth differences in two normal populations using same methodology. , 1976, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[59]  S. Goldstein Embryonic ultrasonographic measurements: crown-rump length revisited. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[60]  J. Hobbins,et al.  A comparison of sector and linear array scanners for the measurement of the fetal femur. , 1985, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[61]  J. Rubin,et al.  Intrauterine growth retardation risk detection for fetuses of unknown gestational age. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[62]  R. Schild,et al.  [Can 3D volumetric analysis of the fetal upper arm and thigh improve conventional 2D weight estimates?]. , 1999, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[63]  G. Pilu,et al.  Can transvaginal fetal biometry be considered a useful tool for early detection of skeletal dysplasias in high‐risk patients? , 1999, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[64]  M. Schulzer,et al.  Ultrasound fetal biometry charts for a North American caucasian population , 1998, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[65]  L. Gonçalves,et al.  Fetal biometry of skeletal dysplasias: a multicentric study. , 1994, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[66]  T. Chung,et al.  Ultrasound Fetal Weight Estimation: Precision or Guess Work? , 1993, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[67]  D. Edelman,et al.  A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. , 1976, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[68]  S. Daya Accuracy of gestational age estimation by means of fetal crown-rump length measurement. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[69]  L. Platt,et al.  The use of a neural network for the ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the macrosomic fetus. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[70]  J. Fleming,et al.  A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF SONAR “CROWN‐RUMP LENGTH” MEASUREMENTS , 1975, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[71]  I. Merkatz,et al.  Intrauterine Growth Retardation-A Prospective Study of the Diagnostic Value of Real-time Sonography Combined With Umbilical Artery Flow Velocimetry , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[72]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Use of femur length/abdominal circumference ratio in detecting the macrosomic fetus. , 1985, Radiology.

[73]  L. Platt,et al.  Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the clinically macrosomic fetus. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[74]  T. Garite,et al.  Ultrasonic Prediction of Fetal Macrosomia in Diabetic Patients , 1982, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[75]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Computer assisted analysis of fetal age in the third trimester using multiple fetal growth parameters , 1983, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[76]  R. Tamura,et al.  Percentile ranks of sonar fetal abdominal circumference measurements. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[77]  N J Dudley,et al.  Selection of appropriate ultrasound methods for the estimation of fetal weight. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[78]  L. Baxi,et al.  Use of ultrasound in antenatal diagnosis of large-for-gestational age infants in diabetic gravid patients. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[79]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Fetal femur length as a predictor of menstrual age: sonographically measured. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[80]  L. Mack,et al.  Evaluation of fetal intracranial anatomy by static and real‐time ultrasound , 1980, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[81]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[82]  Ott Wj The diagnosis of altered fetal growth. , 1988 .

[83]  R. Fescina,et al.  Small for Dates: Evaluation of Different Diagnostic Methods , 1987, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[84]  M. Divon,et al.  Identification of the small for gestational age fetus with the use of gestational age-independent indices of fetal growth. , 1986, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[85]  S. Campbell,et al.  Diagnosis of the small-for-dates fetus by serial ultrasonic cephalometry. , 1971, Lancet.

[86]  G. Kissling,et al.  Recognition of the Overgrown Fetus: In Utero Ponderal Indices , 1987, American journal of perinatology.