Distributed Leadership in Schools: The Case of Elementary Schools Adopting Comprehensive School Reform Models

This is a study of distributed leadership in the context of elementary schools' adoption of comprehensive school reforms (CSR). Most CSRs are designed to configure school leadership by defining formal roles, and we hypothesized that such programs activate those roles by defining expectations for and socializing (e.g., through professional development) role incumbents. Configuration and activation were further hypothesized to influence the performance of leadership functions in schools. Using data from a study of three of the most widely adopted CSR models, support was found for the configuration and activation hypotheses. Leadership configuration in CSR schools differed from that of nonCSR schools in part because of the addition of model-specific roles. Model participation was also related to the performance of leadership functions as principals in CSR schools and CSR-related role incumbents were found to provide significant amounts of instructional leadership. Further support for the activation hypothesis is suggested by positive relationships between leaders' professional development experiences and their performance of instructional leadership.

[1]  D. J. Montgomery,et al.  The Role of the Elementary School Principal in Program Improvement , 1982 .

[2]  R. Linton.  The Study of Man , 1937 .

[3]  Carol S. Weinstein,et al.  Sources of Leadership for Inclusive Education: Creating Schools for All Children , 1999 .

[4]  Ronald R. Edmonds.  Effective Schools for the Urban Poor , 1979 .

[5]  Ann Lieberman,et al.  Building a Professional Culture in Schools. , 1988 .

[6]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[7]  Mark Berends,et al.  Teacher-Reported Effects of New American School Designs: Exploring Relationships to Teacher Background and School Context , 2000 .

[8]  Mark A. Smylie,et al.  Exploring New Approaches to Teacher Leadership for School Improvement , 2005 .

[9]  Philip Hallinger,et al.  Assessing the Instructional Management Behavior of Principals , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[10]  A. Hart.  Reconceiving School Leadership: Emergent Views , 1995, The Elementary School Journal.

[11]  P. Blau.  A FORMAL THEORY OF DIFFERENTIATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1970 .

[12]  Brian Rowan.  The Ecology of School Improvement: Notes on the School Improvement Industry in the United States , 2002 .

[13]  Amanda Datnow,et al.  Managing and Guiding School Reform: Leadership in Success for All Schools , 2001 .

[14]  R. Elmore.  Bridging the Gap between Standards and Achievement. The Imperative for Professional Development in Education , 2003 .

[15]  A. C. Haddon,et al.  The Study of Man , 1898, Nature.

[16]  Rodney T. Ogawa,et al.  Leadership as an Organizational Quality , 1995 .

[17]  K. Riley,et al.  Leadership for Change and School Reform: International Perspectives , 2000 .

[18]  Planned Organizational Change , 1969 .

[19]  L. Anderson,et al.  High School Principals and School Reform: Lessons Learned from a Statewide Study of Project Re:Learning , 1995 .

[20]  Brian Rowan.  Chapter 7: Commitment and Control: Alternative Strategies for the Organizational Design of Schools , 1990 .

[21]  W. Firestone.  Using Reform: Conceptualizing District Initiative , 1989 .

[22]  David C. Dwyer,et al.  The Instructional Management Role of the Principal , 1982 .

[23]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Building a New Structure for School Leadership. , 1999 .

[24]  Thomas R. Hoerr.  Collegiality: A New Way to Define Instructional Leadership. , 1996 .

[25]  Nancy J. Pitner.  Substitutes for Principal Leader Behavior: An Exploratory Study , 1986 .

[26]  Brian Rowan.  Commitment and Control: Alternative Strategies for the Organizational Design of Schools , 1990 .

[27]  Amanda Datnow.  Power and Politics in the Adoption of School Reform Models , 2000 .

[28]  Edwin M. Bridges,et al.  Research on the School Administrator: The State of the Art, 1967-19801 , 1982 .

[29]  Murphy.  The educational leadership challenge : redefining leadership for the 21st century , 2002 .

[30]  Richard Halverson,et al.  Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective , 2001 .

[31]  William A. Firestone,et al.  Who's in Charge Here? Sources of Leadership for Change in Eight Schools , 1995, The Elementary School Journal.

[32]  Mark A. Smylie,et al.  Teacher Leadership: Tensions and Ambiguities in Organizational Perspective , 1990 .

[33]  Shirley M. Hord,et al.  Effective Curriculum Implementation: Some Promising New Insights , 1986, The Elementary School Journal.

[34]  Donald J. Willower,et al.  Elementary School Principals' Work Behavior , 1982 .

[35]  Peter Gronn,et al.  Distributed Properties , 2000 .

[36]  J. Little.  Contested Ground: The Basis of Teacher Leadership in Two Restructuring High Schools , 1995, The Elementary School Journal.

[37]  J. Lipham.  Effective Principal, Effective School , 1981 .

[38]  Bert P. M. Creemers,et al.  School Effectiveness and School Improvement: Sustaining Links , 1997 .

[39]  Joseph Murphy,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Administration , 1999 .

[40]  C. Weiss,et al.  Principals, Shared Decision Making, and School Reform , 1994 .

[41]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[42]  M. Wallace.  Modelling Distributed Leadership and Management Effectiveness: Primary School Senior Management Teams in England and Wales , 2002 .

[43]  M. Mclaughlin,et al.  Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change , 1975 .

[44]  J. Keedy,et al.  Examining teacher instructional leadership within the small group dynamics of collegial groups , 1999 .