NeXOS – The design, development and evaluation of a rehabilitation system for the lower limbs

Abstract Recent years have seen the development of a number of automated and semi-automated systems to support physiotherapy and rehabilitation. These deploy a range of technologies from highly complex purpose built systems to approaches based around the use of industrial robots operating either individually or in combination for applications ranging from stroke rehabilitation to mobility enhancement. The N e XOS project set out to investigate an approach to the rehabilitation of the lower limbs in a way which brought together expertise in engineering design and mechatronics with specialists in rehabilitation and physiotherapy. The result is prototype of a system which is potentially capable in operating in a number of modes from fully independent to providing direct support to a physiotherapist during manipulation of the limb. Designed around a low cost approach for an implementation ultimately capable of use in a patients home using web-based strategies for communication with their support team, the prototype N e XOS system has validated the adoption of an integrated approach to its development. The paper considers this design and development process and provides the results from the initial tests with physiotherapists to establish the operational basis for clinical implementation.

[1]  N. Hogan,et al.  Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? , 2001, Current opinion in neurology.

[2]  W J Maloney,et al.  The influence of continuous passive motion on outcome in total knee arthroplasty. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  The role of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  Pam Enderby,et al.  An investigation into the feasibility of remotely monitored computer therapy for people with aphasia , 2003 .

[5]  N. Hogan,et al.  Overview of clinical trials with MIT-MANUS: a robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation facility. , 1999, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[6]  D. Howie,et al.  Continuous passive motion after primary total knee arthroplasty. Does it offer any benefits? , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  R B Bourne,et al.  Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Continuous Passive Motion After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  N J Giori,et al.  Continuous passive motion (CPM): theory and principles of clinical application. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  A robot test-bed for assistance and assessment in physical therapy , 2001, Adv. Robotics.

[12]  Jonathan P. Bowen SAFETY-CRITICAL SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[13]  Cynthia Perry Zejdlik,et al.  Management of Spinal Cord Injury , 1983 .

[14]  D. Grundy,et al.  ABC of Spinal Cord Injury , 1986 .

[15]  Susan Edwards,et al.  Neurological Physiotherapy: A Problem-Solving Approach , 2002 .