Sexual selection and the evolutionary effects of copying mate choice

We examine the evolutionary consequences of copying mate choice using models in which the preferences of younger females are affected by the mate choices that they observe older females making. We introduce two models of copying, termed “single mate copying” and “mass copying”, corresponding to situations in which immature females imprint on the choices of only one or of a very large number of older females, respectively. Female mating preferences are assumed to evolve only through cultural evolution, while the male trait on which they act is inherited either via a haploid autosomal or a Y-linked locus. Results show that the preference and male trait can rapidly coevolve, with a positive frequencey-dependent advantage to the more common male trait allele. This process can cause a display trait that lowers male viability to increase in a population. Mass copying results in stronger frequency dependence than does single mate copying. Mass copying and, under some conditions, single mate copying lead to two alterative stable equilibria for the male trait. Neither copying model supports variation at the male trait locus, and copying makes it more difficult for a novel male trait phenotype to spread.

[1]  UDO M. SAVALLI,et al.  Female choice , 1989, Nature.

[2]  J. Endler NATURAL SELECTION ON COLOR PATTERNS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  I. L. Heisler,et al.  A Diploid "Sexy Son" Model , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J. Endler Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes , 1983, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[5]  T. Zentall,et al.  Social learning : psychological and biological perspectives , 1988 .

[6]  A. Lill,et al.  Sexual behavior of the lek-forming white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus trinitatis Hartert). , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[7]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[8]  L. Real Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[9]  S. Pruett-Jones,et al.  Independent Versus Nonindependent Mate Choice: Do Females Copy Each Other? , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[10]  J. Höglund,et al.  Copying and sexual selection. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  P. O'donald Genetic Models of Sexual Selection , 1980 .

[12]  M. Ryan Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. , 1990 .

[13]  Robert M. Gibson,et al.  The costs of female choice in a lekking bird , 1992 .

[14]  J. Endler,et al.  Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1990, Science.

[15]  K. Laland,et al.  Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. , 1994, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Sexual Selection and Imitation: Females Copy the Mate Choice of Others , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[18]  PLOIDY AND EVOLUTION BY SEXUAL SELECTION: A COMPARISON OF HAPLOID AND DIPLOID FEMALE CHOICE MODELS NEAR FIXATION EQUILIBRIA , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.

[20]  A. Houde MATE CHOICE BASED UPON NATURALLY OCCURRING COLOR‐PATTERN VARIATION IN A GUPPY POPULATION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  K. Laland,et al.  ON THE EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF SEXUAL IMPRINTING , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  M. Kirkpatrick SEXUAL SELECTION BY FEMALE CHOICE IN POLYGYNOUS ANIMALS , 1987 .

[23]  M J Wade,et al.  Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice , 1994 .

[25]  Lawrence S. Kroll Mathematica--A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer. , 1989 .

[26]  M. Ryan,et al.  Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. , 1994, Science.

[27]  A. Houde Genetic difference in female choice between two guppy populations , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Female mate copying in the guppy {Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects , 1993 .

[29]  Andrew Pomiankowski,et al.  The evolution of female mating preferences for male genetic quality , 1988 .

[30]  P. Richerson,et al.  The role of evolved predispositions in cultural evolution: Or, Human Sociobiology meets Pascal's Wager , 1989 .

[31]  S. Otto ON EVOLUTION UNDER SEXUAL AND VIABILITY SELECTION: A TWO‐LOCUS DIPLOID MODEL , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  When to copy or avoid an opponent's strategy. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  T. Telecky,et al.  Copying Others, an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy for Mate Choice: A Model , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[34]  L A Dugatkin,et al.  Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  F. Breden,et al.  Phenotypic differentiation in female preference related to geographic variation in male predation risk in the Trinidad guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  K. Aoki A Sexual-Selection Model for the Evolution of Imitative Learning of Song in Polygynous Birds , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[37]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[38]  J. Seger UNIFYING GENETIC MODELS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  F. Breden,et al.  Male predation risk determines female preference in the Trinidad guppy , 1987, Nature.

[40]  A. Pomiankowski The costs of choice in sexual selection. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  F. Clarke,et al.  1 9 N ov 2 00 4 On geodesic envelopes and caustics , 2004 .