Developing selective proportionality on the FDH models: new insight on the proportionality axiom

In many cases of DEA-based efficiency measurement systems, only a set of outputs has to be assumed to be proportional to a set of inputs. The assumption of constant returns to scale (CRS) is required with respect to the selected sets of inputs and outputs, preserving the variable returns to scale (VRS) assumption for the remaining factors. In such situations, neither CRS nor VRS-based models can provide valid results. In contrast to that, the selective proportionality axiom allows applying any desired combination of CRS and VRS. This paper proposes free disposal hull (FDH) technologies which incorporate the selective proportionality axiom. The considered technologies do not restrict themselves to convex technologies and are built solely on minimal axioms of non-emptiness and free disposability. The resulting FDH models are formulated as linear programming problems which are not only simple to solve but also provide an intuitive interpretation corresponding to the results. An illustrative numerical example is presented to explain the properties and features of the suggested FDH models.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  FDH Directional Distance Functions with an Application to European Commercial Banks , 2001 .

[3]  Hervé Leleu,et al.  A linear programming framework for free disposal hull technologies and cost functions: Primal and dual models , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Hervé Leleu Mixing DEA and FDH models together , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  C. Storto Investment efficiency in the Italian water service industry: a benchmarking study using data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2011 .

[6]  Noel D. Uri,et al.  The effect of incentive regulation in telecommunications in the USA , 2002, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[7]  Xiaodan Huang,et al.  Measuring efficiency in Chinese commercial banks using a DEA model with undesirable output , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[8]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices , 2006 .

[9]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[10]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: A new method based on goodness-of-fit , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  E. Thanassoulis,et al.  Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: some practical suggestions , 2007 .

[12]  Victor V. Podinovski Production technologies based on combined proportionality assumptions , 2008 .

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Information technology's impact on productivity in conventional power plants , 2009 .

[15]  V. V. Podinovski,et al.  Bridging the gap between the constant and variable returns-to-scale models: selective proportionality in data envelopment analysis , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  V. V. Podinovski On the linearisation of reference technologies for testing returns to scale in FDH models , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Analysing global railway passenger transport through two-staged efficiency model , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[18]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  A Dual Approach to Nonconvex Frontier Models , 2001 .

[19]  Zhi Chen,et al.  A unified DEA approach for evaluating congestion: a case of hotels in Taipei , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[20]  M. Farrell,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY EFFICIENCY , 1957 .