Teaching Online: The Handbook Dilemma in Higher Education

This article examines adult online education by investigating the complex relationship between technology and community. The aim was to explore online teaching in relation to the handbook dilemma teachers meet in their teacher profession by focusing on participation and sharing opportunities. This study analysed several handbooks that aim to help teachers design and implement online education. The advice in the handbooks was contrasted against two empirical cases. Specifically, the study examined how two cases-online adult education courses and special needs teacher training courses-implemented online education with respect to participation and sharing. The analysis suggests that pedagogy is the crucial point and a planned pedagogy is absolutely necessary for designing and implementing effective online education, education that encourages participation and sharing. The findings showed that some handbooks offer meaningful guidance regarding the development of online education, but other publications were not helpful which creates a dilemma for teachers.

[1]  Monica Liljeström,et al.  Enhancing University Students' Interaction and Learning through Formative Peer-Assessment Online , 2010 .

[2]  Muriel Saville-Troike,et al.  The ethnography of communication : an introduction , 1991 .

[3]  Randy Garrison,et al.  Implications of Online Learning for the Conceptual Development and Practice of Distance Education. , 2009 .

[4]  Alexandre Ardichvili,et al.  Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers , 2008 .

[5]  Agneta Hult,et al.  Teachers' Invisible Presence in Net-based Distance Education , 2006 .

[6]  Saul Carliner,et al.  The e-learning handbook : past promises, present challenges , 2008 .

[7]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human-computer interaction , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Design and evaluation of an adaptive incentive mechanism for sustained educational online communities , 2006, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[9]  Cher Ping Lim,et al.  The Role of the Tutor in Asynchronous Discussion Boards: A Case Study of a Pre-Service Teacher Course , 2003 .

[10]  L. Resnyansky.  Computer-mediated communication in higher education: educators’ agency in relation to technology , 2009 .

[11]  Andrea Hemetsberger,et al.  Learning and Knowledge-building in Open-source Communities , 2006 .

[12]  Larry Cuban.  Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[13]  Agneta Hult,et al.  When performance is the product - problems in the analysis of online distance education , 2004 .

[14]  Joseph Luca,et al.  Using online forums to support a community of learning , 2004 .

[15]  Deryn Watson,et al.  Pedagogy before Technology: Re-thinking the Relationship between ICT and Teaching , 2001, Education and Information Technologies.

[16]  Roger Säljö.  Learning and technologies, people and tools in co-ordinated activities , 2004 .

[17]  A. W. Bates,et al.  Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education: Foundations for Success , 2003 .

[18]  C. Scott,et al.  Pressure points: school executive and educational change , 2002 .

[19]  James H. Gray,et al.  Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: COMING TO TERMS WITH COMMUNITY , 2004 .

[20]  Judith B. Pena-Shaff,et al.  Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[21]  L. Porter.  Developing an online curriculum , 2004 .

[22]  Sean Williams,et al.  Student Attitudes toward and Participation in Electronic Discussion , 2002 .

[23]  Kadir Beycioglu,et al.  Ethical Technology Use, Policy, and Reactions in Educational Settings , 2012 .

[24]  Paul Shrivastava,et al.  Management Classes as Online Learning Communities , 1999 .

[25]  Ingrid Helleve,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Teachers' Professional Development , 2010 .

[26]  T. Söderström,et al.  Premises, Promises: Connection, community, and communion in online education , 2006 .

[27]  Gordon I. McCalla,et al.  Social Capital in Virtual Learning Communities and Distributed Communities of Practice. , 2003 .

[28]  Andreas Lund,et al.  Designs for Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Learning Environments , 2011 .

[29]  Rotimi Taiwo,et al.  Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction , 2010 .

[30]  Anne Gerdes,et al.  The Tension Between Human and Cyborg Ethics , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Ethics Educ..

[31]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[32]  Curtis J. Bonk.  The World is Open: How Web Technology Is Revolutionizing Education , 2009 .

[33]  Champika K. Soysa,et al.  Social Capital, Self-Esteem, Popularity, Need for Accessibility to Friends, and Stress Predict Cyber Technology Use , 2013, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[34]  Pnina Shachaf,et al.  Online communities of practice typology revisited , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Zygmunt Bauman,et al.  Modernity and Ambivalence , 1990 .

[36]  Z. Bauman.  Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World , 2001 .

[37]  Jennifer A. Duncan-Howell,et al.  Changing the metaphor : the potential of online communities in teacher professional development , 2009 .

[38]  David E. Hansen.  Knowledge Transfer in Online Learning Environments , 2008 .

[39]  Jo E. Williamson,et al.  Digital Equity in Schools: An Overview of Current Trends , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Ethics Educ..

[40]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[41]  Rob Kling,et al.  Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: Introduction , 2004 .

[42]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  James Boyle,et al.  Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: a review and case study , 2000, Comput. Educ..