A chemical substitution study for a wet processing textile mill in Turkey

Abstract Wet processing textile industry has many different processing stages (dyeing, sizing, de-sizing, scouring, softening, etc.). Many chemicals currently used in the wet processing textile industry affect the amount and the type of waste produced and their influence on the aquatic life of the receiving stream. One of the critical steps in pollution prevention studies is auditing the use of chemicals and making the necessary chemical substitutions. This chemical substitution study was conducted on one of the major textile factories in Turkey with a capacity of 20,000 tons of denim fabric per year. During this study, chemical consumption level, receipts applied, environmentally problematic and alternative chemicals were examined. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques (BAT) for the Textiles Industry was accepted as main reference document and also related case studies were examined. According to the study, over 70% reduction in sulphide, which is very toxic to aquatic life, was achieved by replacing sulphur dyestuff with low sulphide content. By replacing an alternative complexing agent, the mill not only prevented the 3100 kg/month COD load to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), but also obtained more biodegradable wastewater generated during production. On the other hand, some of the chemical substitution options were on progress or dropped.

[1]  Recursos Naturales y Pesca México. Secretaría del Medio Ambiente,et al.  Pollution prevention in the textile industry , 1996 .

[2]  Derin Orhon,et al.  Wastewater Reuse for the Minimization of Fresh Water Demand in Coastal Areas—Selected Cases from the Textile Finishing Industry , 2003, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[3]  Cesar Pulgarin,et al.  Biodegradability assessment of several priority hazardous substances: choice, application and relevance regarding toxicity and bacterial activity. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[4]  John R Provost,et al.  Effluent improvement by source reduction of chemicals used in textile printing , 2008 .

[5]  Thomas T. Shen Pollution Prevention Case Studies , 1995 .

[6]  Robert Noyes Pollution Prevention Technology Handbook , 1994 .

[7]  H. R. Jones,et al.  Pollution control in the textile industry , 1973 .

[8]  Pollutant Source Reduction : Part II-Chemical Handling , 2000 .

[9]  I. Hendrickx,et al.  Pollution prevention studies in the textile wet processing industry , 1995 .

[10]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[11]  J. E. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of a teflon based ultraviolet light system on the disinfection of water in a textile air washer , 1987 .

[12]  Frans Oosterhuis,et al.  Substitution of hazardous chemicals: A case study in the framework of the project 'Assessing innovation dynamics induced by environment policy' , 2006 .

[13]  Sidney G. Cooper,et al.  The Textile Industry: Environmental Control and Energy Conservation , 1978 .

[14]  Joseph M. DeSimone,et al.  Practical Approaches to Green Solvents , 2002, Science.

[15]  Harry M Freeman,et al.  Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook , 1994 .

[16]  C Norr,et al.  Modification of the Zahn-Wellens test: determination of the biodegradability of poorly soluble, adsorbing and volatile substances by measurement of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. , 2001, Chemosphere.