Effects of Phytase Supplementation of Diets with Two Tiers of Nutrient Specifications on Growth Performance and Protein Efficiency Ratios of Broiler Chickens

In two feeding experiments male and mixed-sex broiler chicks were offered diets based on sorghum and a wheat-sorghum blend with two tiers of nutrient specifications, without and with microbial phytase (600 and 800 FTU/kg), from 7-25 and 1-42 days post-hatch, respectively. The nutrient specifications for protein, amino acids, energy density and phosphorus (P) of standard diets were reduced to formulate the modified diets on a least-cost basis. Calculated differences in nutrient specifications between standard and modified diets ranged from 14.3 to 17.1 g/kg crude protein, 0.24 to 0.40 MJ/kg apparent metabolisable energy (AME) and 1.06 to 1.20 g/kg available P. In both experiments, reduced nutrient specifications had a negative impact on growth rates and feed efficiency and phytase supplementation had a positive influence on growth performance and protein efficiency ratios (PER). Phytase addition to the less expensive, modified diets either partially or entirely compensated for reduced growth performance and, consequently, feed costs per kg of live weight gain were reduced. In Experiment 1, phytase increased (p<0.001) nitrogen-corrected AME (AMEn) from 15.39 to 15.89 MJ/kg dry matter. For nitrogen (N) retention there was an interaction (p<0.05) between diet type and phytase as the effects of phytase on N retention were more pronounced in the modified diets, with an increase from 0.512 to 0.561. These results demonstrate the positive effects of phytase on protein and energy utilisation, in addition to its established liberation of phytate-bound P and illustrate the feasibility of assigning nutrient replacement values to the feed enzyme for consideration in least-cost ration formulations. Further work is, however, required to define the most appropriate reductions in nutrient specifications in association with phytase supplementation.

[1]  R. Pym Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium , 2002 .

[2]  C. Parsons,et al.  Efficacy of phytase for increasing protein efficiency ratio values of feed ingredients. , 2001, Poultry science.

[3]  V. Ravindran,et al.  Effectiveness of exogenous microbial phytase in improving the bioavailabilities of phosphorus and other nutrients in maize-soya-bean meal diets for broilers , 2001 .

[4]  W. Sauer,et al.  Effect of phytase on protein and amino acid digestibility and energy utilisation , 2001 .

[5]  D. Baker,et al.  Microbial phytase does not improve protein-amino acid utilization in soybean meal fed to young chickens. , 2001, The Journal of nutrition.

[6]  V. Ravindran,et al.  Microbial phytase improves performance, apparent metabolizable energy, and ileal amino acid digestibility of broilers fed a lysine-deficient diet. , 2001, Poultry science.

[7]  V. Ravindran,et al.  Phytate and phytase: consequences for protein utilisation , 2000, Nutrition Research Reviews.

[8]  C. Parsons,et al.  Limiting order of amino acids and the effects of phytase on protein quality in corn gluten meal fed to young chicks. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[9]  V. Ravindran,et al.  Response of broiler chickens to microbial phytase supplementation as influenced by dietary phytic acid and non-phytate phosphorous levels. II. Effects on apparent metabolisable energy, nutrient digestibility and nutrient retention , 2000, British poultry science.

[10]  V. Ravindran,et al.  Response of broiler chickens to microbial phytase supplementation as influenced by dietary phytic acid and non-phytate phosphorus contents. I. Effects on bird performance and toe ash. , 1999, British poultry science.

[11]  V. Ravindran,et al.  Influence of microbial phytase on apparent ileal amino acid digestibility of feedstuffs for broilers. , 1999, Poultry science.

[12]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Generic combustion method for determination of crude protein in feeds: collaborative study. , 1989, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[13]  L. M. Potter Bioavailability of phosphorus from various phosphates based on body weight and toe ash measurements. , 1988, Poultry science.

[14]  F. Hill,et al.  Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. , 1958, The Journal of nutrition.