Strength, elasticity and the limits of energy dissipation in two related sea urchin spines with biomimetic potential

The calcitic spines of the sea urchins Heterocentrotus mamillatus and H. trigonarius are promising role models for lightweight applications, bone tissue scaffolds and energy dissipating processes due to their highly porous and organized structure. Therefore, mechanical properties including Young's Modulus, strength, failure behaviour and energy dissipation efficiency have been investigated in depth with uniaxial compression experiments, 3-point bending tests and resonance frequency damping analysis. It was found that despite a very similar structure, H. trigonarius has a significantly lower porosity than H. mamillatus leading to a higher strength and Young's Moduli, but limited ability to dissipate energy. In order to show reliable energy dissipation during failure in uniaxial compression, a transition porosity of 0.55-0.6 needs to be exceeded. The most effective structure for this purpose is a homogeneous, foam-like structure confined by a thin and dense shell that increases initial strength and was found in numerous spines of H. mamillatus. Sharp porosity changes induced by dense growth layers or prominent wedges of the spines' radiating building principle act as structural weaknesses, along which large flakes can be spalled, reducing the energy dissipation efficiency considerably. The high strength and Young's Modulus at the biologically necessary high porosity levels of the spines is useful for Heterocentrotus and their construction therefore remains to be a good example of biomimetics. However, the energy dissipative failure behaviour may be regarded as a mere side effect of the structure.

[1]  Robert F. Cook,et al.  Microhardness, toughness, and modulus of Mohs scale minerals , 2006 .

[2]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Optimization of cylindrical shells with compliant cores , 2007 .

[3]  M. Burghammer,et al.  Structure-property relationships of a biological mesocrystal in the adult sea urchin spine , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Tobias B. Grun,et al.  Structural stress response of segmented natural shells: a numerical case study on the clypeasteroid echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  K. Towe Echinoderm Calcite: Single Crystal or Polycrystalline Aggregate , 1967, Science.

[6]  K. Nickel,et al.  Determination of the elastic modulus of highly porous samples by nanoindentation: a case study on sea urchin spines , 2010 .

[7]  Robert Danzer,et al.  Fracture statistics of ceramics – Weibull statistics and deviations from Weibull statistics , 2007 .

[8]  K. Vecchio,et al.  Lightweight Open-Cell Scaffolds from Sea Urchin Spines with Superior Material Properties for Bone Defect Repair. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[9]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Plants and Animals as Source of Inspiration for Energy Dissipation in Load Bearing Systems and Facades , 2016 .

[10]  David J. Green,et al.  Characterization of edge effects in cellular materials , 1990 .

[11]  D. J. Green,et al.  Compressive behavior and deformation-mode map of an open cell alumina , 1990 .

[12]  D. Raup Crystallography of Echinoid Calcite , 1959, The Journal of Geology.

[13]  R. Conner,et al.  Uniaxial quasistatic and dynamic compressive response of foams made from hollow glass microspheres , 2016 .

[14]  S. Weiner,et al.  Structural Differences Between Biogenic Amorphous Calcium Carbonate Phases Using X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy** , 2002 .

[15]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The mechanical properties of cellular solids , 1983 .

[16]  O. Joensuu,et al.  The occurrence of magnesian calcites in nature , 1955 .

[17]  J. Pearse,et al.  Growth Zones in the Echinoid Skeleton , 1975 .

[18]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Interplay between Calcite, Amorphous Calcium Carbonate, and Intracrystalline Organics in Sea Urchin Skeletal Elements , 2018 .

[19]  C. Berthold,et al.  Sea urchin spines as a model-system for permeable, light-weight ceramics with graceful failure behavior. Part I. Mechanical behavior of sea urchin spines under compression , 2009 .

[20]  C. Lauer,et al.  Strength-size relationships in two porous biological materials. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  D. J. Green,et al.  Uniaxial Strength Behavior of Brittle Cellular Materials , 1993 .

[22]  Tobias B. Grun,et al.  Structural design of the minute clypeasteroid echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[23]  P. Panine,et al.  Formation and Growth of Amorphous Colloidal CaCO3 Precursor Particles as Detected by Time-Resolved SAXS , 2002 .

[24]  Paolo Colombo,et al.  Cellular Ceramics: Structure, Manufacturing, Properties and Applications , 2005 .

[25]  Robert L. Coble,et al.  Effect of Porosity on Physical Properties of Sintered Alumina , 1956 .

[26]  Werner Hansmann,et al.  Mechanical design in spines of diadematoid echinoids (Echinodermata, Echinoidea) , 1983, Zoomorphology.

[27]  H. Nissen Crystal Orientation and Plate Structure in Echinoid Skeletal Units , 1969, Science.

[28]  C. Berthold,et al.  Sea Urchin Spines as a Model-System for Permeable, Light-Weight Ceramics with Graceful Failure Behavior. Part II. Mechanical Behavior of Sea Urchin Spine Inspired Porous Aluminum Oxide Ceramics under Compression , 2009 .

[29]  L. Gibson Biomechanics of cellular solids. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Population structure of the echinoid Heterocentrotus mammillatus (L.) along the littoral zone of south-eastern Sinai , 1990, Coral Reefs.

[31]  Jie Dong,et al.  Characterization and investigation of the deformation behavior of porous magnesium scaffolds with entangled architectured pore channels. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[32]  M. Alizadeh,et al.  Compressive properties and energy absorption behavior of Al–Al2O3 composite foam synthesized by space-holder technique , 2012 .

[33]  J. Aizenberg,et al.  Factors involved in the formation of amorphous and crystalline calcium carbonate: a study of an ascidian skeleton. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[34]  J. Aizenberg,et al.  Amorphous calcium carbonate transforms into calcite during sea urchin larval spicule growth , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  J. Weber,et al.  Unusual strength properties of echinoderm calcite related to structure. , 1969, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[36]  Tobias B. Grun,et al.  Morphology and porosity of the spines of the sea urchin Heterocentrotus mamillatus and their implications on the mechanical performance , 2018, Zoomorphology.

[37]  E. White,et al.  New Porous Biomaterials by Replication of Echinoderm Skeletal Microstructures , 1971, Nature.

[38]  K. Yamashita,et al.  Preparation and properties of pressureless-sintered dense calcite ceramics , 2017 .

[39]  N. Toader,et al.  Energy absorption in functionally graded concrete bioinspired by sea urchin spines , 2017 .

[40]  W. Pabst,et al.  Young's modulus of isotropic porous materials with spheroidal pores , 2014 .

[41]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Mechanical properties of porous ceramics in compression: On the transition between elastic, brittle, and cellular behavior , 2012 .

[42]  A. Heuer,et al.  The structure of sea urchin spines, large biogenic single crystals of calcite , 2000 .

[43]  K. Klang,et al.  13. Sea urchin spines as role models for biological design and integrative structures , 2017 .

[44]  B. Hur,et al.  Effects of porosity and pore size on the compressive properties of closed-cell Mg alloy foam , 2013 .

[45]  Adam J. Stevenson,et al.  Mechanical properties and failure behavior of unidirectional porous ceramics , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[46]  A new theory to explain the origin of growth lines in sea urchin spines , 1986 .

[47]  J. Smith,et al.  Comparative metabolic ecology of tropical herbivorous echinoids on a coral reef , 2018, PloS one.

[48]  J. N. Weber The incorporation of magnesium into the skeletal calcites of echinoderms , 1969 .

[49]  J. Grossmann,et al.  Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines , 2013, Zoomorphology.

[50]  K. Vecchio,et al.  Conversion of sea urchin spines to Mg-substituted tricalcium phosphate for bone implants. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[51]  S. Weiner,et al.  Sea Urchin Spine Calcite Forms via a Transient Amorphous Calcium Carbonate Phase , 2004, Science.

[52]  Philip Koshy,et al.  Flexural Strength of Ceramic and Glass Rods , 2009 .

[53]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  The Design of Accurate Micro-Compression Experiments , 2006 .

[54]  M. Ashby,et al.  The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.