PixFRET, an ImageJ plug‐in for FRET calculation that can accommodate variations in spectral bleed‐throughs

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) allows the user to investigate interactions between fluorescent partners. One crucial issue when calculating sensitized emission FRET is the correction for spectral bleed‐throughs (SBTs), which requires to calculate the ratios between the intensities in the FRET and in the donor or acceptor settings, when only the donor or acceptor are present. Theoretically, SBT ratios should be constant. However, experimentally, these ratios can vary as a function of fluorophore intensity, and assuming constant values may hinder precise FRET calculation. One possible cause for such a variation is the use of a microscope set‐up with different photomultipliers for the donor and FRET channels, a set‐up allowing higher speed acquisitions on very dynamic fluorescent molecules in living cells. Herein, we show that the bias introduced by the differential response of the two PMTs can be circumvented by a simple modeling of the SBT ratios as a function of fluorophore intensity. Another important issue when performing FRET is the localization of FRET within the cell or a population of cells. We hence developed a freely available ImageJ plug‐in, called PixFRET, that allows a simple and rapid determination of SBT parameters and the display of normalized FRET images. The usefulness of this modeling and of the plug‐in are exemplified by the study of FRET in a system where two interacting nuclear receptors labeled with ECFP and EYFP are coexpressed in living cells. Microsc. Res. Tech. 68:51–58, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Y. Liu,et al.  Reliable and global measurement of fluorescence resonance energy transfer using fluorescence microscopes. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[2]  F. Wouters,et al.  Imaging biochemistry inside cells. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[3]  Markus Rehm,et al.  Single-cell Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Analysis Demonstrates That Caspase Activation during Apoptosis Is a Rapid Process , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  B. Herman,et al.  Quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements using fluorescence microscopy. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Jerry T. Thompson,et al.  Synthesis of a high-affinity fluorescent PPARgamma ligand for high-throughput fluorescence polarization assays. , 2003, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[6]  W. Wahli,et al.  Fluorescence Imaging Reveals the Nuclear Behavior of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor/Retinoid X Receptor Heterodimers in the Absence and Presence of Ligand*♦ , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  T. Jovin,et al.  FRET imaging , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Ammasi Periasamy,et al.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy imaging of live cell protein localizations , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  FRET or no FRET: a quantitative comparison. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Kees Jalink,et al.  Correcting confocal acquisition to optimize imaging of fluorescence resonance energy transfer by sensitized emission. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Horst Wallrabe,et al.  Characterization of one- and two-photon excitation fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy. , 2003, Methods.

[12]  Ammasi Periasamy,et al.  7 – FRET Data Analysis: The Algorithm , 2005 .