Decoding intentions from movement kinematics

How do we understand the intentions of other people? There has been a longstanding controversy over whether it is possible to understand others’ intentions by simply observing their movements. Here, we show that indeed movement kinematics can form the basis for intention detection. By combining kinematics and psychophysical methods with classification and regression tree (CART) modeling, we found that observers utilized a subset of discriminant kinematic features over the total kinematic pattern in order to detect intention from observation of simple motor acts. Intention discriminability covaried with movement kinematics on a trial-by-trial basis, and was directly related to the expression of discriminative features in the observed movements. These findings demonstrate a definable and measurable relationship between the specific features of observed movements and the ability to discriminate intention, providing quantitative evidence of the significance of movement kinematics for anticipating others’ intentional actions.

[1]  Corrado Sinigaglia,et al.  Intention and motor representation in purposive action , 2014 .

[2]  V. Manera,et al.  Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[4]  A. Clark Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind , 2015 .

[5]  R. Lemon,et al.  What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons , 2013, Current Biology.

[6]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Correction: Intention Understanding in Autism , 2009, PLoS ONE.

[7]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The motor theory of social cognition: a critique , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Francesca Ugolotti Serventi,et al.  Ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices make distinct contribution to action organization and intention understanding. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[10]  Jessica L. Allen,et al.  Neuromechanical Principles Underlying Movement Modularity and Their Implications for Rehabilitation , 2015, Neuron.

[11]  Leonardo Fogassi,et al.  Neurophysiological bases underlying the organization of intentional actions and the understanding of others’ intention , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[12]  U. Castiello,et al.  Cues to intention: The role of movement information , 2011, Cognition.

[13]  Francesco Cerutti,et al.  Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Pancreatic Islets and Bone Marrow into Islet-Like Cell Phenotype , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[15]  N. Holmes,et al.  To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action goal, but observers do not detect these differences , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Walter B. Weimer,et al.  Cognition and the symbolic processes , 1974 .

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[18]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1—correlation within subjects , 1995 .

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Impairment of actions chains in autism and its possible role in intention understanding , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  James M. Kilner,et al.  Learning to understand others' actions , 2010, Biology Letters.

[21]  Patric Bach,et al.  The affordance-matching hypothesis: how objects guide action understanding and prediction , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror mechanism: recent findings and perspectives , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  D. Altman,et al.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2--Correlation between subjects. , 1995, BMJ.

[24]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Reflecting on the mirror neuron system in autism: A systematic review of current theories , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[26]  James M. Kilner,et al.  More than one pathway to action understanding , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Emma Gowen,et al.  Imitation in autism: why action kinematics matter , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[28]  Yuan Yang,et al.  Predicting Object Size from Hand Kinematics: A Temporal Perspective , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Intention Understanding in Autism , 2009, PloS one.

[30]  Giuseppe Tridente,et al.  The Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Regulates the Expression of IL-6 and CCL5 in Prostate Tumour Cells by Activating the MAPK Pathways1 , 2009, PloS one.

[31]  Leonardo Fogassi,et al.  Neuronal Chains for Actions in the Parietal Lobe: A Computational Model , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  S. Gallagher Direct perception in the intersubjective context , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[33]  P. Pascolo,et al.  On the relationship between mouth opening and "broken mirror neurons" in autistic individuals. , 2012, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[34]  Joel Krueger,et al.  Seeing mind in action , 2012 .

[35]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[36]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  Intentions in the Brain , 2015, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.