Academic culture: a promising mediator of school leaders’ influence on student learning

This study is a quantitative exploration of a new construct the authors label as “academic culture (AC).” Treating it as generalized latent variable composed of academic press (AP), disciplinary climate (DC), and teachers’ use of instructional time, the purpose of this paper is to explore the potential of this construct to be a key mediator of school leaders’ influence on student learning. The study is guided by three hypotheses.,Responses by 856 elementary teachers from 70 schools to an online survey measured the three components of AC along with school leadership (SL). Provincial tests of writing, reading, and math were used as measures of student achievement (SA). Social economic status (SES) was used as control variable for the study. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and correlations were calculated among all variables. Analyses included intra-class correlation analysis, regression equations, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling.,Evidence confirmed the study’s three hypotheses: first, AP, DC, and instructional time formed a general latent construct, AC; second, AC explained a significant proportion of the variance in SA, controlling for student SES; and third, AC was a significant mediator of SL’s influence on SA. Concepts and measures of academic optimism (AO) and AC are compared in the paper and implications for practice and future research are outlined.,This first study of AC explored the relationship between AC and SA. Although at least two AO studies have included measures of distributed leadership, minimal attention has been devoted to actually testing the claim that AO is amenable to the influence of explicit leadership practices (as distinct from enabling school structures) and is a powerful mediator of SL effects on student learning. Addressing this limitation of AO research to date, the present study included a well-developed measure of leadership practices and assessed the value of AC as a mediator of such practices.

[1]  W. Hoy,et al.  School Bureaucracies that Work: Enabling, Not Coercive , 2000 .

[2]  D. Roby.  Research on School Attendance and Student Achievement: A Study of Ohio Schools , 2004 .

[3]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[4]  Ronald H. Heck,et al.  Collaborative Leadership Effects on School Improvement: Integrating Unidirectional- and Reciprocal-Effects Models , 2010, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  Composing Group-Level Constructs From Individual-Level Survey Data , 2009 .

[6]  R. Aitken,et al.  Making Schools Smarter: Leading With Evidence , 2006 .

[7]  Pamela D. Tucker,et al.  Systematic Review of Key Leader Practices Found to Influence Student Achievement , 2016 .

[8]  Cristián Bellei,et al.  Does lengthening the school day increase students’ academic achievement? Results from a natural experiment in Chile , 2009 .

[9]  David Reynolds,et al.  School Effectiveness and School Improvement in the United Kingdom , 1996 .

[10]  W. Hoy,et al.  The road to open and healthy schools : a handbook for change , 1996 .

[11]  S. J. Rosenholtz.  Effective Schools: Interpreting the Evidence , 1985, American Journal of Education.

[12]  Kenneth Leithwood,et al.  What We Know about Successful School Leadership , 2003 .

[13]  R. Heck,et al.  Reassessing the Principal's Role in School Effectiveness: A Review of Empirical Research, 1980-1995 , 1996 .

[14]  Joseph B. Murphy.  Academic Press: Translating High Expectations into School Policies and Classroom Practices. , 1982 .

[15]  J. Willms,et al.  School Disciplinary Climate: Characteristics and Effects on Eighth Grade Achievement , 2004, Alberta Journal of Educational Research.

[16]  Wayne K. Hoy,et al.  Organizational Climate and Student Achievement: A Parsimonious and Longitudinal View , 1998 .

[17]  James H. Steiger,et al.  Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling , 2007 .

[18]  K. Leithwood,et al.  Direction-setting school leadership practices: a meta-analytical review of evidence about their influence , 2015 .

[19]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[20]  C. Teddlie,et al.  A History of School Effectiveness and Improvement Research in the USA Focusing on the Past Quarter Century , 2007 .

[21]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[22]  Daniel R. Marburger,et al.  Does Mandatory Attendance Improve Student Performance? , 2006 .

[23]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  The Self-Fulfillment of the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy , 1987 .

[24]  W. Firestone,et al.  Culture of School Is a Key to More Effective Instruction , 1984 .

[25]  P. Mortimore,et al.  School Matters: The Junior Years , 1995 .

[26]  D. Lortie,et al.  Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study , 1976 .

[27]  A. W. Hoy,et al.  Academic Optimism of Schools: A Force for Student Achievement , 2006 .

[28]  H. M. Marks,et al.  Principal Leadership and School Performance: An Integration of Transformational and Instructional Leadership , 2003 .

[29]  Leigh McGuigan.  The role of enabling bureaucracy and academic optimism in academic achievement growth , 2005 .

[30]  K. Leithwood,et al.  The Nature and Effects of Transformational School Leadership , 2012 .

[31]  J. Little.  Norms of Collegiality and Experimentation: Workplace Conditions of School Success , 1982 .

[32]  C. Hossler,et al.  The relationship of increased instructional time to student achievement (Consortium on Educational Policy Studies, School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana) , 1988 .

[33]  H. Walberg,et al.  Toward a Knowledge Base for School Learning , 1993 .

[34]  Ronald H. Heck,et al.  Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning , 2014 .

[35]  K. Leithwood,et al.  Linking Leadership to Student Learning , 2011 .

[36]  Eleanor Francke.  Response to Goodlad: A Painful Picture. , 1983 .

[37]  Roger C. Shouse,et al.  Academic press and sense of community: Conflict, congruence, and implications for student achievement , 1996 .

[38]  Xin Ma.  Provincial Effects on Reading Achievement , 2007 .

[39]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[40]  Anthony H. Normore.  A New Agenda for Research in Educational Leadership , 2006 .

[41]  Marsha Moye Jurewicz.  Organizational citizenship behaviors of middle school teachers: A study of their relationship to school climate and student achievement , 2004 .

[42]  W. Hoy,et al.  Principal Leadership: Creating a Culture of Academic Optimism to Improve Achievement for All Students , 2006 .

[43]  Eckhard Klieme,et al.  Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes , 2014 .

[44]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  Bridging or buffering?: The impact of schools’ adaptive strategies on student achievement , 2005 .

[45]  A. W. Hoy,et al.  Collective Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning, Measure, and Impact on Student Achievement , 2000 .

[46]  K. Leithwood.  THE ONTARIO LEADERSHIP FRAMEWORK 2012 , 2012 .

[47]  J. Törnroos,et al.  Mathematics Textbooks, Opportunity to Learn and Student Achievement. , 2005 .

[48]  Xin Ma,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Modelling of Student and School Effects on Academic Achievement , 2000 .

[49]  R. Rosenthal.  Pygmalion Effects: Existence, Magnitude, and Social Importance , 1987 .

[50]  Jana Michelle Alig-Mielcarek.  A model of school success: instructional leadership, academic press, and student achievement , 2003 .

[51]  Jia Wang,et al.  Opportunity to Learn: The Impacts and Policy Implications , 1998 .

[52]  Kenneth Leithwood,et al.  Testing a Conception of How School Leadership Influences Student Learning , 2010 .

[53]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .