The Elusive Target of IT Project Success

This paper presents findings from an exploratory study that investigated how 36 companies operating in three industry sectors in Australia define and measure Information Technology (IT) project success. Our study suggests that when success criteria are formally defined and then measured, IT project outcomes are improved and project resources are better utilized. In addition, those companies with the most effective methods for defining and measuring IT project success shared some important common practices. Based on these findings, this paper presents insights for defining (and improving) project success in complex environments and a model of effective practices.

[1]  Bernhard Wieder,et al.  The politics of post‐implementation reviews , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Re-conceptualising failure: social shaping meets IS research , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  William H. DeLone,et al.  Global boundaries, task processes and IS project success: a field study , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Transforming failure into success through organisational learning: an analysis of a manufacturing information system , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  John Wateridge,et al.  How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? , 1998 .

[7]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Evaluating investments in IT , 1992, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Amy W. Gatian.  Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Executives’ Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology: A Process-Oriented Approach , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[11]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  OTHER-SETTINGS GENERALIZATION IN IS RESEARCH , 2006 .

[12]  Chad Lin,et al.  The enigma of evaluation: benefits, costs and risks of IT in Australian small-medium-sized enterprises , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Zahir Irani,et al.  The Propagation of Technology Management Taxonomies for Evaluating Investments in Information Systems , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[15]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success , 2001, MIS Q..

[16]  Rob Thomsett.  Third wave project management: a handbook for managing the complex information systems for the 1990s , 1993 .

[17]  Dan Remenyi,et al.  Management of information technology evaluation ‐ the development of a managerial thesis , 1999 .

[18]  Michael Sherwood-Smith,et al.  Maximise information systems value by continuous participative evaluation , 1999 .

[19]  Timo Saarinen,et al.  An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[22]  Andrew Martin,et al.  The 3-D Model of Information Systems Success: The Search for the Dependent Variable Continues , 1996 .

[23]  Kam Jugdev,et al.  A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[25]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem , 1998 .

[27]  D. Christenson,et al.  Understanding the Role of “Vision” in Project Success , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[28]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  The Effects of Information System User Expectations on Their Performance and Perceptions , 1993, MIS Q..

[29]  David Baccarini,et al.  The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success , 1999 .

[30]  Terry Cooke-Davies,et al.  The “real” success factors on projects , 2002 .

[31]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .