Assessment of parameter uncertainty in plant growth model identification

For the parametric identification of plant growth models, we generally face limited or uneven experimental data, and complex nonlinear dynamics. Both aspects make model parametrization and uncertainty analysis a difficult task. The Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimator is often used since it can provide estimations rather rapidly with an appropriate goodness-of-fit. However, the confidence intervals are generally calculated based on linear approximations which make the uncertainty evaluation unreliable in the case of strong nonlinearity. A Bayesian approach, the Convolution Particle Filtering (CPF), can thus be applied to estimate the unknown parameters along with the hidden states. In this case, the posterior distribution obtained can be used to evaluate the uncertainty of the estimates. In order to improve its performance especially with stochastic models and in the case of rare or irregular experimental data, a conditional iterative version of the Convolution Particle Filtering (ICPF) is proposed. When applied to the Log Normal Allocation and Senescence model (LNAS) with sugar beet data, the two CPF related approaches showed better performance compared to the GLS method. The ICPF approach provided the most reliable estimations. Meanwhile, two sources of the estimation uncertainty were identified: the variance generated by the stochastic nature of the algorithm (relatively small for the ICPF approach) and the residual variance partly due to the noise models.

[1]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[2]  Paul-Henry Cournède,et al.  An efficient computational method for global sensitivity analysis and its application to tree growth modelling , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[4]  C. Spitters,et al.  Crop growth models: their usefulness and limitations. , 1990 .

[5]  F. Campillo,et al.  Convolution Particle Filter for Parameter Estimation in General State-Space Models , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  P. de Reffye,et al.  Analysis of the Density Effects on the Source-sink Dynamics in Sugar-Beet Growth , 2009, 2009 Third International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications.

[7]  Haikady N. Nagaraja,et al.  Inference in Hidden Markov Models , 2006, Technometrics.

[8]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Estimating parameters and hidden variables in non-linear state-space models based on ODEs for biological networks inference , 2007, Bioinform..

[9]  Paul-Henry Cournède,et al.  Filtrage par noyaux de convolution itératif , 2012 .

[10]  Paul-Henry Cournède,et al.  Some Parameter Estimation Issues in Functional-Structural Plant Modelling , 2011 .

[11]  W. E. Taylor Small Sample Properties of a Class of Two Stage Aitken Estimators , 1977 .

[12]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Sequential Imputations and Bayesian Missing Data Problems , 1994 .

[13]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  Daniel Wallach,et al.  Parameter Estimation for Crop Models , 2001 .

[15]  P. de Reffye,et al.  Parameter optimization and field validation of the functional-structural model GREENLAB for maize. , 2006, Annals of botany.

[16]  T. Nilson A theoretical analysis of the frequency of gaps in plant stands , 1971 .

[17]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications , 1966 .

[18]  P. Reffye,et al.  A Morphogenetic Crop Model for Sugar-Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) , 2008, 0811.0581.

[19]  Lydie Guilioni,et al.  Quantifying physiological determinants of genetic variation for yield potential in sunflower. SUNFLO: a model-based analysis. , 2011, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[20]  Vivien Rossi Filtrage non linéaire par noyaux de convolution : application à un procédé de dépollution biologique , 2004 .

[21]  G. Kitagawa Monte Carlo Filter and Smoother for Non-Gaussian Nonlinear State Space Models , 1996 .