The enigma of the Chinese learner

Although increasingly challenged in the higher education literature in recent years, there is still a common perception among teachers of the stereotypical Chinese rote learner. This perception, however, lies uncomfortably with the paradox that Chinese learners nevertheless often excel in their studies, in comparison with their Western counterparts. This comparative study of Chinese and Australian accountancy students provides evidence that, while surface approaches to learning can be associated with mechanical rote learning, the Chinese tradition of memorization through repetition can be used to deepen understanding and achieve high levels of academic performance. In recognizing this phenomenon, the enigma of the Chinese learner is better understood.

[1]  J. Vermunt.  Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis , 1996 .

[2]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  Cognitive Style and Learning Strategies: Some Implications for Training Design , 1997 .

[3]  John Biggs,et al.  Approaches to the Enhancement of Tertiary Teaching , 1989 .

[4]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Learning Problems of Overseas Students: Two Sides of a Story , 1987 .

[5]  John Biggs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES IN STUDY PROCESSES , 1978 .

[6]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[7]  Peter J. Smith,et al.  Differences between Chinese and Australian students: some implications for distance educators. , 1999 .

[8]  Some Evidence on the Reliability and Validity of the Biggs Study Process Questionnaire with Filipino Children , 1982 .

[9]  S N Smith,et al.  Approaches to study of three Chinese national groups. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  J. Kirby,et al.  Differentiation of Learning Processes within Ability Groups , 1983 .

[11]  J. Biggs.  Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes , 1979 .

[12]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[13]  D. Murphy.  Offshore Education: A Hong Kong Perspective. , 1987 .

[14]  G. Hofstede.  Cultural differences in teaching and learning , 1986 .

[15]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Are Cognitive Styles Still in Style , 1997 .

[16]  S. Volet,et al.  A short‐term longitudinal investigation of cross‐cultural differences in study approaches using Biggs' SPQ questionnaire , 1994 .

[17]  Pak Kuen Auyeung,et al.  A cross cultural study of the learning style of accounting students , 1996 .

[18]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  A comparative study of approaches to studying in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom , 1998 .

[19]  G. Pask.  STYLES AND STRATEGIES OF LEARNING , 1976 .

[20]  B. Cooper,et al.  The Export of Accountancy Education To Malaysia And Singapore: An Australian Experience , 1997 .

[21]  Peter Renshaw,et al.  Chinese students at an Australian university: Adaptability and continuity , 1996 .

[22]  Attitudes towards objective testing: a cross-cultural perspective , 1993 .

[23]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. , 1990 .

[24]  M. Bond,et al.  The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth , 1988 .

[25]  F. Marton,et al.  Conceptions of learning , 1993 .

[26]  David Watkins,et al.  The Internal Structure and Predictive Validity of the Inventory of Learning Processes: Some Australian and Filipino Data , 1981 .

[27]  D. Child,et al.  BIGGS' SPQ: A BRITISH STUDY OF ITS INTERNAL STRUCTURE , 1984 .

[28]  L. Svensson,et al.  SYMPOSIUM: LEARNING PROCESSES AND STRATEGIES—III , 1977 .

[29]  Paul Ramsden,et al.  Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment , 1979 .

[30]  J. Hattie,et al.  AUSTRALIAN AND FILIPINO INVESTIGATIONS OF THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF BIGGS' NEW STUDY PROCESS QUESTIONNAIRE , 1981 .

[31]  D. Kember,et al.  CULTURAL SPECIFICITY OF APPROACHES TO STUDY , 1990 .

[32]  M. G. Eley,et al.  Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students , 1992 .

[33]  M. Regmi,et al.  An investigation of the approach to learning of Nepalese tertiary students , 1990 .

[34]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[35]  J. Biggs.  What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[36]  N. Entwistle,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS ON STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING , 1981 .

[37]  David Kember,et al.  A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student , 1991 .

[38]  F. Marton.  Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[39]  David Kember,et al.  Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students , 2000 .

[40]  John Biggs,et al.  DIMENSIONS OF STUDY BEHAVIOUR: ANOTHER LOOK AT ATI , 1976 .

[41]  V. Beattie,et al.  Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? , 1997 .

[42]  David Watkins,et al.  The‐Asian‐learner‐as‐a‐rote‐learner Stereotype: myth or reality? , 1991 .

[43]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[44]  P. Booth,et al.  The quality of learning in accounting education: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance , 1999 .

[45]  D. Kember.  The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning? , 1996 .

[46]  D. Kember,et al.  Does higher education promote independent learning? , 1990 .