The hard sciences.

[1]  J S Banks,et al.  Committee proposals and restrictive rules. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  H. Varian,et al.  Preplay contracting in the Prisoners' dilemma. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Kevin I McCabe,et al.  Are decisions under risk malleable? , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Wooders,et al.  Multijurisdictional economies, the tiebout hypothesis, and sorting. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  T. Feddersen,et al.  Elections, information aggregation, and strategic voting. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral economics: reunifying psychology and economics. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Nash.  Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J K Goeree,et al.  Stochastic game theory: for playing games, not just for doing theory. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  How can statistical mechanics contribute to social science? , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  D G Saari,et al.  Chaos, but in voting and apportionments? , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. Green,et al.  Does canvassing increase voter turnout? A field experiment. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A A Schuessler,et al.  Ecological inference. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.