How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research

A meta-analysis of supplemental, adult-instructed one-to-one reading interventions for elementary students at risk for reading failure was conducted. Reading outcomes for 42 samples of students (N = 1,539) investigated in 29 studies reported between 1975 and 1998 had a mean weighted effect size of 0.41 when compared with controls. Interventions that used trained volunteers or college students were highly effective. For Reading Recovery interventions, effects for students identified as discontinued were substantial, whereas effects for students identified as not discontinued were not significantly different from zero. Two studies comparing one-to-one with small-group supplemental instruction showed no advantage for the one-to-one programs.

[1]  Howard D. White,et al.  SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION AND LITERATURE RETRIEVAL , 2019, The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis.

[2]  H. Cooper,et al.  Making the most of summer school: a meta-analytic and narrative review. , 2000, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[3]  E. Hiebert.  Reading Recovery in the United States: What Difference Does it Make to an Age Cohort? , 1994 .

[4]  S. Butler.  Reading program—Remedial, integrated, and innovative , 1991, Annals of dyslexia.

[5]  T. Conway,et al.  Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. , 1999 .

[6]  Connie Juel,et al.  Cross-Age Tutoring between Student Athletes and At-Risk Children. , 1991 .

[7]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[8]  A. Loper.  Metacognitive Development: Implications for Cognitive Training , 1980 .

[9]  K. Harris.  Learning Disabilities Research , 1988, Journal of learning disabilities.

[10]  D. R. Recht,et al.  Results of an early intervention program for first grade children at risk for reading disability. , 1995 .

[11]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[12]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  The Effectiveness of One-to-One Tutoring by Community Tutors for at-Risk Beginning Readers , 1997 .

[13]  B. Bloom.  The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[14]  William E. Tunmer,et al.  Phonological Processing Skills and the Reading Recovery Program. , 1993 .

[15]  Lynne Outhred,et al.  An evaluation of Reading Recovery , 1995 .

[16]  Edward R. Sipay,et al.  Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability , 1996 .

[17]  P. Mantzicopoulos,et al.  Use of the SEARCH/TEACH Tutoring Approach with Middle-Class Students at Risk for Reading Failure , 1992, The Elementary school journal.

[18]  B. Dorval.  Field Evaluation of a Tutorial Reading Program Emphasizing Phoneme Identification Skills. , 1978 .

[19]  Anne W. Graves,et al.  Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. , 1986 .

[20]  Marie M. Clay,et al.  The early detection of reading difficulties , 1981 .

[21]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Observations of Students with Learning Disabilities in General Education Classrooms , 1993 .

[22]  G. Winer,et al.  Prevention by specific perceptual remediation for vulnerable first-graders. Controlled study and follow-up of lasting effects. , 1977, Archives of general psychiatry.

[23]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Efficacy of Peer Tutoring in Reading for Students with Disabilities: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. , 1991 .

[24]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[25]  R. Rosenthal.  Parametric measures of effect size. , 1994 .

[26]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Broken Promises: Reading Instruction in the Resource Room , 1998 .

[27]  K. Wheldall,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of reading recovery: A critique. , 1992 .

[28]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  What Works for Students at Risk: A Research Synthesis. , 1989 .

[29]  Y. Lou,et al.  Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[30]  Edward J. Kameenui,et al.  Direct Instruction Reading , 1979 .

[31]  Michael A. Wallach,et al.  Teaching all children to read , 1976 .

[32]  H. Cooper.  Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews , 1998 .

[33]  A. Silver,et al.  Scanning, Diagnosis, and Intervention in the Prevention of Reading Disabilities , 1978, Journal of Learning Disabilities.

[34]  Catherine A. Rosemary,et al.  A community volunteer tutorial that works , 1996 .

[35]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Grouping Practices and Reading Outcomes for Students with Disabilities , 1999 .

[36]  Patricia F. Vadasy,et al.  Effects of Tutoring in Phonological and Early Reading Skills on Students at Risk for Reading Disabilities , 2000, Journal of learning disabilities.

[37]  Nancy Flanagan Knapp,et al.  A Reading Apprenticeship for Delayed Primary Readers. , 1998 .

[38]  Linda M. Jenkins,et al.  Comparing Small Group and Tutorial Instruction in Resource Rooms , 1974 .

[39]  Connie Juel,et al.  What Makes Literacy Tutoring Effective , 1996 .

[40]  James E. Houston.  Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors , 2001 .

[41]  Barbara A. Wasik,et al.  Preventing Early Reading Failure with One-to-One Tutoring: A Review of Five Programs. , 1993 .

[42]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[43]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews, 2nd ed. , 1989 .

[44]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  Cooper, Harris, and Larry V. Hedges, eds., The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1994. , 1994 .

[45]  Timothy Shanahan,et al.  On the Effectiveness and Limitations of Tutoring in Reading , 1998 .

[46]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Comparing Instructional Models for the Literacy Education of High-Risk First Graders , 1994 .

[47]  Steven A. Zemelman,et al.  Whole Language Works: Sixty Years of Research. , 1999 .

[48]  T. Shanahan,et al.  Reading recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. , 1995 .

[49]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[50]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Instructional Grouping for Reading: Teachers' Views , 1997 .

[51]  B. Wasik,et al.  A Review of the Effects of Extra-Year Kindergarten Programs and Transitional First Grades. , 1992 .

[52]  Darrell Morris,et al.  Helping Low Readers in Grades 2 and 3: An After-School Volunteer Tutoring Program , 1990, The Elementary School Journal.

[53]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Reading Research for Students with LD , 1999, Journal of learning disabilities.

[54]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Integrating Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews , 1989 .