Standard Radiographs Are Not Sufficient for Assessing Knee Mechanical Axis in Patients With Advanced Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND The use of standard radiographs, and measured tibiofemoral angle (TFA), to assess lower extremity alignment is commonly practiced despite limited knowledge of its relationship to the mechanical axis (MA), as measured on hip-to-ankle (HTA) radiographs. This study assessed the predictive accuracy of previously developed equations, developed gender-specific regression equations using predictors from standard radiographs, and the clinical effectiveness of these equations in a large sample of cases using HTA radiographs as a gold standard. METHODS The MA was measured on HTA radiographs, whereas TFA and femoral angle were measured on standard radiographs in 788 cases diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis. RESULTS Multiple regression analyses indicated that TFA, femoral angle, and height were the strongest factors associated with the predicting MA, accounting for 83% of the variance for men and 86% for women, but were able to predict only the actual MA within ±3° in 66% of men and 69% of women. When applied to previously reported regression equations with similar results, the best predicative accuracy obtained within ±3° was 61% and 63% of men and women, respectively. CONCLUSION Standard radiographs are not sufficient for determining MA, and HTA radiographs should be used while making surgical decisions aimed at correcting alignment to within ±3° or for assessing alignment post-total knee arthroplasty. In addition, surgical alignment outcomes reported in previous research using standard radiographs should be viewed with caution.

[1]  G. Engh,et al.  Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  C. Chang,et al.  The radiographic predictors of symptom severity in advanced knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity. , 2011, The Knee.

[3]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Static knee alignment and its association with radiographic knee osteoarthritis. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[4]  D. Felson,et al.  Structural factors associated with malalignment in knee osteoarthritis: the Boston osteoarthritis knee study. , 2005, Journal of Rheumatology.

[5]  Kenneth E. Davis,et al.  Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  L. Sharma,et al.  Full-limb and knee radiography assessments of varus-valgus alignment and their relationship to osteoarthritis disease features by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  R. Morris,et al.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  F. Picard,et al.  Hip-Knee-Ankle Radiographs Are More Appropriate for Assessment of Post-Operative Mechanical Alignment of Total Knee Arthroplasties than Standard AP Knee Radiographs. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  T. K. Kim,et al.  What should be considered in using standard knee radiographs to estimate mechanical alignment of the knee? , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[10]  D S Barrett,et al.  The importance of tibial alignment: finite element analysis of tibial malalignment. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  C. Chang,et al.  Femoral Lateral Bowing and Varus Condylar Orientation Are Prevalent and Affect Axial Alignment of TKA in Koreans , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  David T Felson,et al.  An update on the pathogenesis and epidemiology of osteoarthritis. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[13]  Y. Iwamoto,et al.  Femoral shaft bowing influences the correction angle for high tibial osteotomy , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[14]  A. Jackson,et al.  Nonexercise models for estimating VO2max with waist girth, percent fat, or BMI. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  K P George,et al.  Allometric modeling does not determine a dimensionless power function ratio for maximal muscular function. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Longitudinal study of the relationship between knee angle and tibiofemoral cartilage volume in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[17]  T. Vail,et al.  A comparative assessment of alignment angle of the knee by radiographic and physical examination methods. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  S. Bierma-Zeinstra,et al.  Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  J. Arredondo,et al.  Restoration of limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and methods. , 1997, Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association.

[21]  Kay M Crossley,et al.  Is there an alternative to the full-leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment in osteoarthritis? , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  L. Sharma,et al.  The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. , 2001, JAMA.

[23]  R P Jakob,et al.  Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  E Y Chao,et al.  Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  L. Kazis,et al.  The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. , 1987, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  S. Cannon,et al.  The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. , 2003, The Knee.

[27]  J E Ballard,et al.  PRESS-related statistics: regression tools for cross-validation and case diagnostics. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.