Equivalent Information for Multiobjective Interactive Procedures

Despite the mathematical properties and algorithmic features of an interactive method, that method's success usually lies in the kind of information it requires from the decision maker. In some cases, this information constrains the decision maker. If she does not find it easy and comfortable to answer the questions posed by the algorithm, then she will very likely give inconsistent answers, and the method will fail to find her most preferred solution. Therefore, it is of interest to find relations among the different kinds of information (local weights, local trade-offs, reference points, etc.) to allow the decision maker to choose what kind of questions he wants to answer, and to provide him with enough information to give such answers. In this paper, we define equivalent information---that is, different kinds of information---that produces the same solution when used in their corresponding interactive schemes.

[1]  J. Dyer Interactive Goal Programming , 1972 .

[2]  Joseph J. Talavage,et al.  A Tradeoff Cut Approach to Multiple Objective Optimization , 1980, Oper. Res..

[3]  Masatoshi Sakawa,et al.  Interactive multiobjective decision making by the sequential proxy optimization technique: SPOT , 1982 .

[4]  Ignacy Kaliszewski Erratum to "Out of the mist - Towards decision-maker-friendly multiple criteria decision making support" [Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158(2004) 293-307] , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Mariano Luque,et al.  Promoin: An Interactive System for Multiobjective Programming , 2002, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[6]  Thomas Hanne Intelligent strategies for meta multiple criteria decision making , 2001 .

[7]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[8]  Ignacy Kaliszewski,et al.  Quantitative Pareto Analysis by Cone Separation Technique , 1994 .

[9]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[10]  Andrzej P. Wierzbick Basic properties of scalarizmg functionals for multiobjective optimization , 1977 .

[11]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Interactive Nonlinear Multiobjective Procedures , 2003 .

[12]  Lorraine R. Gardiner,et al.  Unified interactive multiple objective programming , 1994 .

[13]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  A Visual Interactive Method for Solving the Multiple-Criteria Problem , 1986 .

[14]  Wan Seon Shin,et al.  Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey I - continuous case , 1991, Comput. Oper. Res..

[15]  Arthur M. Geoffrion,et al.  An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department , 1972 .

[16]  Andrzej P. Wierzbicki,et al.  The Use of Reference Objectives in Multiobjective Optimization , 1979 .

[17]  Ignacy Kaliszewski,et al.  Out of the mist--towards decision-maker-friendly multiple criteria decision making support , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology , 1983 .

[19]  A. Wierzbicki Convergence of Interactive Procedures of Multiobjective Optimization and Decision Support , 1997 .

[20]  Hirotaka Nakayama,et al.  Satisficing Trade-off Method for Multiobjective Programming , 1984 .

[21]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming , 1983, Math. Program..