Intracoronary stenting and risk for major adverse cardiac events during the first month.

BACKGROUND Our rationale for this study was to analyze the risk for procedural failure of attempted stenting and the risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after success and to develop a risk stratification protocol for successful procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS Stenting was attempted in 2894 procedures during the 5-year study period (success in 98.3% of 3815 lesions). After failure, the MACE rate was 42.6%. The risk for failure was higher for lesions in the left circumflex coronary artery or in venous bypass grafts and after an acute occlusion before stenting; it increased with stenosis length or grade and decreased with vessel size and growing institutional experience in stenting. After success, death occurred in 0.8%, death or myocardial infarction in 2.0%, and any MACE in 3.6%. Independent risk factors for MACE were older age, diabetes, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, impaired left ventricular function, residual dissections, stent overlap, longer stented segments, and a postprocedural regimen without ticlopidine. Procedural factors were substantially stronger predictors than operator-independent variables available before procedures. Overall, the risk declined after the first 3 days. Two major factors exhibited time-dependent variations of their influence: while residual dissections were the dominant risk factor within the first 3 days with a reduction after that, no protective effect of ticlopidine could be identified before day 3. From these results, we derived a risk stratification protocol for individual procedures. CONCLUSIONS These results underscore the importance of optimal angiographic results and the need for antiplatelet regimens with immediate onset. Our risk stratification protocol may guide individual postprocedural care and allow us to compare risk profiles of different study populations and to devise quality control programs for stenting.

[1]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Intracoronary ultrasound observations during stent implantation. , 1994, Circulation.

[2]  E J Topol,et al.  Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[3]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Major benefit from antiplatelet therapy for patients at high risk for adverse cardiac events after coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent placement: analysis of a prospective risk stratification protocol in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen (ISAR) trial. , 1997, Circulation.

[4]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[5]  W. Ganz,et al.  The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Bruno,et al.  Ticlopidine’s Mechanism of Action on Human Platelets , 1993 .

[7]  G. Roubin,et al.  Stratification of the risk of thrombosis after intracoronary stenting for threatened or acute closure complicating coronary balloon angioplasty: a Cook registry study. , 1995, American heart journal.

[8]  W. Baxley,et al.  Predictors of thrombotic complications after placement of the flexible coil stent. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Four‐Year Experience With Palmaz‐Schatz Stenting in Coronary Angioplasty Complicated by Dissection With Threatened or Present Vessel Closure , 1994, Circulation.

[10]  E. Topol,et al.  The myth of the myocardial 'infarctlet' during percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures. , 1996, Circulation.

[11]  A. Cribier,et al.  Intracoronary stent implantation without ultrasound guidance and with replacement of conventional anticoagulation by antiplatelet therapy. 30-day clinical outcome of the French Multicenter Registry. , 1996, Circulation.

[12]  P Hall,et al.  Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. , 1995, Circulation.

[13]  A. Colombo,et al.  Results of a consecutive series of patients receiving only antiplatelet therapy after optimized stent implantation. Comparison of aspirin alone versus combined ticlopidine and aspirin therapy. , 1997, Circulation.

[14]  J. Tobis,et al.  Subacute stent thrombosis in the era of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stenting without anticoagulation: frequency, predictors and clinical outcome. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  F Joffre,et al.  Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  H. S. Mueller,et al.  The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Julio C. Palmaz,et al.  Clinical Experience With the Palmaz‐Schatz Coronary Stent: Initial Results of a Multicenter Study , 1991, Circulation.

[19]  I. Penn,et al.  Thrombosis and restenosis after stenting in failed angioplasty: comparison with elective stenting. , 1994, American heart journal.

[20]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  S. Ellis,et al.  Subacute stent thrombosis: evolving issues and current concepts. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  ACC Expert Consensus document on coronary artery stents. Document of the American College of Cardiology. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[25]  E. Topol,et al.  Multicenter investigation of coronary stenting to treat acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: clinical and angiographic outcomes. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.