Edinburgh Research Explorer Public attitudes towards alcohol control policies in Scotland and England: Results from a mixed-methods study

The harmful effects of heavy drinking on health have been widely reported, yet public opinion on governmental responsibility for alcohol control remains divided. This study examines UK public attitudes towards alcohol policies, identi fi es underlying dimensions that inform these, and relationships with perceived effectiveness. A cross-sectional mixed methods study involving a telephone survey of 3477 adult drinkers aged 16 e 65 and sixteen focus groups with 89 adult drinkers in Scotland and England was conducted between September 2012 and February 2013. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to reduce twelve policy statements into underlying dimensions. These dimensions were used in linear regression models examining alcohol policy support by demographics, drinking behaviour and perceptions of UK drinking and government responsibility. Findings were supplemented with a thematic analysis of focus group transcripts. A majority of survey respondents supported all alcohol policies, although the level of support varied by type of policy. Greater enforcement of laws on under-age sales and more police patrolling the streets were strongly supported while support for pricing policies and restricting access to alcohol was more divided. PCA identi fi ed four main dimensions underlying support on policies: alcohol availability, provision of health information and treatment services, alcohol pricing, and greater law enforcement. Being female, older, a moderate drinker, and holding a belief that gov- ernment should do more to reduce alcohol harms were associated with higher support on all policy dimensions. Focus group data revealed fi ndings from the survey may have presented an overly positive level of support on all policies due to differences in perceived policy effectiveness. Perceived effectiveness can help inform underlying patterns of policy support and should be considered in conjunction with standard measures of support in future research on alcohol control policies.

[1]  J. Rise,et al.  Predicting attitudes toward a restrictive alcohol policy: Using a model of distal and proximal predictors. , 2015, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[2]  S. Cohn.  Reconceptualising public acceptability: A study of the ways people respond to policies aimed to reduce alcohol consumption , 2015, Health.

[3]  M. Suhrcke,et al.  Public acceptability of population-level interventions to reduce alcohol consumption: A discrete choice experiment , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[4]  M. Livingston,et al.  Public perceptions and alcohol policies: six case studies that examine trends and interactions. , 2014, Drug and alcohol review.

[5]  R. Room,et al.  Changes in Australian attitudes to alcohol policy: 1995-2010. , 2014, Drug and alcohol review.

[6]  M. Suhrcke,et al.  Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[7]  J. Rise,et al.  Changes in attitudes towards restrictive alcohol policy measures: the mediating role of changes in beliefs , 2013, Journal of substance use.

[8]  Jason Ferris,et al.  Surveying alcohol and other drug use through telephone sampling: a comparison of landline and mobile phone samples , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[9]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[10]  A. Lonsdale,et al.  A minimum price per unit of alcohol: A focus group study to investigate public opinion concerning UK government proposals to introduce new price controls to curb alcohol consumption , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[11]  J. Langley,et al.  Non-response bias in a community survey of drinking, alcohol-related experiences and public opinion on alcohol policy. , 2012, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[12]  J. Langley,et al.  NON-RESPONSE BIAS IN A COMMUNITY SURVEY OF DRINKING, ALCOHOL-RELATED EXPERIENCES AND PUBLIC OPINION ON ALCOHOL POLICY , 2012, Injury Prevention.

[13]  M. Wall,et al.  The International Alcohol Control (IAC) study-evaluating the impact of alcohol policies. , 2012, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[14]  Peter Scarborough,et al.  The economic burden of ill health due to diet, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol and obesity in the UK: an update to 2006-07 NHS costs. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[15]  S. Macdonald,et al.  The relationship between alcohol problems, perceived risks and attitudes toward alcohol policy in Canada. , 2011, Drug and alcohol review.

[16]  A. Kumar,et al.  Responses to health promotion campaigns: resistance, denial and othering , 2011 .

[17]  Charles Livingstone,et al.  A review of public opinion towards alcohol controls in Australia , 2011, BMC public health.

[18]  P. Donnelly.  Alcohol, no ordinary commodity, research and public policy , 2010 .

[19]  Ishani Kar-Purkayastha,et al.  Public health: ethical issues. , 2009 .

[20]  Michael Livingston,et al.  Mapping Australian public opinion on alcohol policies in the new millennium. , 2009, Drug and alcohol review.

[21]  E. Österberg,et al.  Public opinion and community-based prevention of alcohol-related harms , 2009 .

[22]  Q. Bu,et al.  Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities. , 2008, The Milbank quarterly.

[23]  P. Anderson.  Binge Britain: Alcohol and the National Response , 2007 .

[24]  P. Remington,et al.  New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century. , 2007, Annual review of public health.

[25]  E. Adlaf,et al.  Alcohol marketing and retailing: Public opinion and recent policy developments in Canada , 2007 .

[26]  A. Bowling.  Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. , 2005, Journal of public health.

[27]  Eva Wallin,et al.  Public opinion on alcohol service at licensed premises: a population survey in Stockholm, Sweden 1999-2000. , 2005, Health policy.

[28]  R. Room,et al.  Alcohol and public health , 2005, The Lancet.

[29]  J. Michael Brick,et al.  A Minimally Intrusive Method for Sampling Persons in Random Digit Dial Surveys , 2004 .

[30]  Joy L. Johnson,et al.  Othering and Being Othered in the Context of Health Care Services , 2004, Health communication.

[31]  M. Newcomb,et al.  Sociodemographic and individual predictors of alcohol policy attitudes: results from a US probability sample. , 2001, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[32]  L. Kaskutas,et al.  Differential Perceptions of Alcohol Policy Effectiveness , 1993, Journal of public health policy.

[33]  I. Jolliffe.  Discarding Variables in a Principal Component Analysis. Ii: Real Data , 1973 .

[34]  T. Heeren,et al.  Patterns of change in implementation of state alcohol control policies in the United States, 1999-2011. , 2015, Addiction.

[35]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The Global Burden of Disease Study , 2003 .

[36]  A. Agresti,et al.  Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences , 1979 .