How to properly decompose economic efficiency using technical and allocative criteria with non-homothetic DEA technologies

We discuss how to properly decompose economic efficiency when the underlying technology is non-homothetic using alternative allocative and technical efficiency criteria. We first show that only under the production of one output and assuming the particular case of constant returns to scale homotheticity, we may claim that the standard radial models correctly measure pure technical efficiency. Otherwise, when non-homotheticity is assumed, we then show that these traditional estimations would measure an undetermined mix of technical and allocative efficiency. To restore a consistent measure of technical efficiency in the non-homothetic case we introduce a new methodology that takes as reference for the economic efficiency decomposition the preservation of the allocative efficiency of firms producing in the interior of the technology. This builds upon the so-called reversed approach recently introduced by Bogetoft et al. (2006) that allows estimating allocative efficiency without presuming that technical efficiency has been already accomplished. We illustrate our methodology within the Data Envelopment Analysis framework adopting the most simple non-homothetic BCC model and a numerical application. In this application we show that there are significant differences in the allocative and technical efficiency scores depending on the approach.

[1]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models , 1995, Oper. Res. Lett..

[2]  R. Färe,et al.  Directional output distance functions: endogenous directions based on exogenous normalization constraints , 2013 .

[3]  W. Greene,et al.  Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Ryuzo Sato,et al.  Homothetic and Non-Homothetic CES Production Functions , 1977 .

[5]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[6]  R. Shephard Cost and production functions , 1953 .

[7]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[8]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[9]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[10]  Maria Iosifidi,et al.  On the Estimation of Marginal Cost , 2012 .

[11]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[12]  Thomas Mitchell,et al.  Homotheticity and Non-Radial Changes , 2001 .

[13]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[14]  Børge Obel,et al.  Allocative efficiency of technically inefficient production units , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Walter Briec,et al.  Metric Distance Function and Profit: Some Duality Results , 1999 .

[16]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Statistical inference for DEA estimators of directional distances , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Walter Briec,et al.  Generalized benefit functions and measurement of utility , 2004, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[18]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  The directional profit efficiency measure: on why profit inefficiency is either technical or allocative , 2013 .

[19]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research , 2004 .

[20]  Chia-Yen Lee,et al.  Meta-Data Envelopment Analysis: Finding a Direction Towards Marginal Profit Maximization , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  G. Debreu The Coefficient of Resource Utilization , 1951 .

[22]  R. Kopp,et al.  The decomposition of frontier cost function deviations into measures of technical and allocative efficiency , 1982 .