Commentary: Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective

Peer assessment is an important component of a more participatory culture of learning. The articles collected in this special issue constitute a representative kaleidoscope of current research on peer assessment. In this commentary, we argue that research on peer assessment is currently in a stage of adolescence, grappling with the developmental tasks of identity formation and affiliation. Identity formation may be achieved by efforts towards a shared terminology and joint theory building, whereas affiliation may be reached by a more systematic consideration of research in related fields. To reach identity formation and affiliation, preliminary ideas for a cognitively toned, process-related model of peer assessment and links to related research fields, especially to research on collaborative learning, are presented.

[1]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring , 1995 .

[2]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments , 2010 .

[3]  D. Clements,et al.  Social-cognitive behaviors and higher-order thinking in educational computer environments , 1992 .

[4]  Gert Rijlaarsdam,et al.  The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL , 2010 .

[5]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Argumentation, Computer Support, and the Educational Context of Confronting Cognitions , 2003 .

[6]  P. Robert-Jan Simons,et al.  The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[7]  M. Wittrock.  Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[8]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning , 1999 .

[9]  V. Aleven,et al.  Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments , 2003 .

[10]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics , 1999 .

[11]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[12]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning , 2007, Learning and Instruction.

[13]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? , 2010 .

[14]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-based Education: Integrating Human Factors and Personalization , 2009 .

[15]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[16]  Hayes.  identifying the organization of wi iiing processes , 1980 .

[17]  E. Stahl,et al.  Help-seeking in Interactive Learning Environments: Effectiveness of Help and Learner-related Factors in a Dyadic Setting , 2004, ICLS.

[18]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning , 2009 .

[19]  A. King.  ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning , 1997 .

[20]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Learning from Worked-Out-Examples: A Study on Individual Differences , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning : cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives , 2007 .

[22]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[23]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[24]  A. King.  Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective , 2007 .

[25]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[26]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[27]  Selma Leitão,et al.  The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building , 2000, Human Development.

[28]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Student revision with peer and expert reviewing , 2010 .

[29]  D. Sluijsmans,et al.  Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions , 2010 .

[30]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Fostering interactivity through peer assessment in web-based collaborative learning environments , 2009 .

[31]  D. Sluijsmans,et al.  Fostering Interactivity through Formative Peer Assessment in (Web-Based) Collaborative Learning Envi , 2009 .

[32]  Mien Segers,et al.  Peer Assessment as a Collaborative Learning Activity: The Role of Interpersonal Variables and Conceptions. , 2010 .