Status of NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Long-Duration Test as of 50,000 h and 900 kg Throughput

The NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) project is developing the next-generation solar electric propulsion ion propulsion system with significant enhancements beyond the state-of-the-art NASA Solar Electric Propulsion Technology Application Readiness (NSTAR) ion propulsion system in order to provide future NASA science missions with enhanced propulsion capabilities. As part of a comprehensive thruster service life assessment, the NEXT Long-Duration Test (LDT) was initiated in June 2005 to demonstrate throughput capability and validate thruster service life modeling. The NEXT LDT exceeded its original qualification throughput requirement of 450 kg in December 2009. To date, the NEXT LDT has set records for electric propulsion lifetime and has demonstrated 50,170 hours of operation, processed 902 kg of propellant, and delivered 34.9 MN-s of total impulse. The NEXT thruster design mitigated several life-limiting mechanisms encountered in the NSTAR design, dramatically increasing service life capability. Various component erosion rates compare favorably to the pretest predictions based upon semi-empirical ion thruster models. The NEXT LDT either met or exceeded all of its original goals regarding lifetime demonstration, performance and wear characterization, and modeling validation. In light of recent budget constraints and to focus on development of other components of the NEXT ion propulsion system, a voluntary termination procedure for the NEXT LDT began in April 2013. As part of this termination procedure, a comprehensive post-test performance characterization was conducted across all operating conditions of the NEXT throttle table. These measurements were found to be consistent with prior data that show minimal degradation of performance over the thruster's 50 kh lifetime. Repair of various diagnostics within the test facility is presently planned while keeping the thruster under high vacuum conditions. These diagnostics will provide additional critical information on the current state of the thruster, in regards to performance and wear, prior to destructive post-test analyses performed on the thruster under atmosphere conditions.

[1]  George C. Soulas.  Design and Performance of 40 cm Ion Optics , 2001 .

[2]  G. Ganapathi,et al.  The Ion Propulsion System For Dawn , 2003 .

[3]  Andrew Hoskins,et al.  Development of a Prototype Model Ion Thruster for the NEXT System , 2004 .

[4]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Status of the NEXT Long-Duration Test After 23,300 Hours of Operation , 2009 .

[5]  John R. Brophy,et al.  Development and Testing of the Dawn Ion Propulsion System , 2006 .

[6]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance Characteristics of the NEXT Long-Duration Test After 16,550 h and 337 kg of Xenon Processed , 2009 .

[7]  James E. Polk,et al.  Lifetime Qualification Standard for Electric Thrusters , 2009 .

[8]  Jonathan L. VanNoord,et al.  Lifetime Assessment of the NEXT Ion Thruster , 2010 .

[9]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Results of the 2000 hr Wear Test of the HiPEP Ion Thruster with Pyrolytic Graphite Ion Optics , 2006 .

[10]  Daniel A. Herman,et al.  Application of the NEXT Ion Thruster Lifetime Assessment to Thruster Throttling , 2008 .

[11]  George C. Soulas,et al.  The Impact of Back-Sputtered Carbon on the Accelerator Grid Wear Rates of the NEXT and NSTAR Ion Thrusters , 2013 .

[12]  Dan M. Goebel,et al.  Neutralizer hollow cathode simulations and comparisons with ground test data , 2009 .

[13]  Dan M. Goebel,et al.  Sputtering yield measurements during low energy xenon plasma bombardment , 2003 .

[14]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Long-Duration Test Plume and Wear Characteristics after 16,550 h of Operation and 337 kg of Xenon Processed , 2008 .

[15]  Brian Wong,et al.  Performance of the NEXT Engineering Model Power Processing Unit , 2007 .

[16]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the NEXT Ion Engine , 2003 .

[17]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Prototype-Model NEXT Ion Thruster , 2007 .

[18]  D. Goebel,et al.  Sputtering Yields of Ion Thruster Grid and Cathode Materials During Very Low Energy Xenon Plasma Bombardment , 2003 .

[19]  G. Ganapathi,et al.  Status of the Dawn Ion Propulsion System , 2004 .

[20]  John Steven Snyder,et al.  Environmental Testing of the NEXT PM1 Ion Engine , 2013 .

[21]  James S. Sovey,et al.  NEXT PM1R Ion Thruster and Propellant Management System Wear Test Results , 2009 .

[22]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Engine 2000 Hour Wear Test Results , 2004 .

[23]  John R. Brophy,et al.  Sensitivity Testing of the NSTAR Ion Thruster , 2007 .

[24]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Thruster Performance Dispersion Analyses , 2007 .

[25]  John R. Brophy,et al.  Status of the Extended Life Test of the Deep Space 1 Flight Spare Ion Engine After 30,000 Hours of Operation , 2003 .

[26]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Status of the Next Ion Thruster Long Duration Test , 2013 .

[27]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance of titanium optics on a NASA 30 cm ion thruster , 2000 .

[28]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance of the NASA 30 cm Ion Thruster , 1993 .

[29]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Engine 2000 hour Wear Test Plume and Erosion Results , 2004 .

[30]  Steven R. Oleson,et al.  Phobos and Deimos Sample Return Mission Using Solar Electric Propulsion , 2009 .

[31]  Daniel A. Herman,et al.  NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Project Qualification Propellant Throughput Milestone: Performance, Erosion, and Thruster Service Life Prediction After 450 kg , 2010 .

[32]  R. Spektor.  Characterization of the NASA NEXT Thruster , 2009 .

[33]  Nicole J. Meckel,et al.  NEXT Ion Propulsion System Production Readiness , 2007 .

[34]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Single String Integration Test Results , 2009 .

[35]  M. Rayman.  The successful conclusion of the Deep Space 1 Mission: important results without a flashy title , 2002 .

[36]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Propulsion System Development Status and Performance , 2007 .

[37]  John R. Anderson,et al.  An overview of the results from an 8200 hour wear test of the NSTAR ion thruster , 1999 .

[38]  John R. Anderson,et al.  An Overview of the Results from the 30,000 Hr Life Test of Deep Space 1 Flight Spare Ion Engine , 2004 .

[39]  Gary Wang,et al.  Vibration Test of a Breadboard Gimbal for the NEXT Ion Engine , 2006 .

[40]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Long-Duration Test Neutralizer Performance and Erosion Characteristics , 2009 .

[41]  James S. Sovey,et al.  NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Component Verification Testing , 2008 .

[42]  Daniel A. Herman.  Status of the NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Long-Duration Test After 30,352 Hours of Operation , 2010 .

[43]  John W. Dankanich,et al.  Interplanetary Electric Propulsion Uranus Mission Trades Supporting the Decadal Survey , 2011 .

[44]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Demonstration of the NSTAR ion propulsion system on the Deep Space One mission , 2001 .

[45]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Multi-Thruster Array Test - Engineering Demonstration , 2006 .

[46]  Steven R. Oleson,et al.  Main Belt Asteroid Sample Return Mission Design , 2010 .

[47]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT: NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster , 2002 .