Contextuality in canonical systems of random variables

Random variables representing measurements, broadly understood to include any responses to any inputs, form a system in which each of them is uniquely identified by its content (that which it measures) and its context (the conditions under which it is recorded). Two random variables are jointly distributed if and only if they share a context. In a canonical representation of a system, all random variables are binary, and every content-sharing pair of random variables has a unique maximal coupling (the joint distribution imposed on them so that they coincide with maximal possible probability). The system is contextual if these maximal couplings are incompatible with the joint distributions of the context-sharing random variables. We propose to represent any system of measurements in a canonical form and to consider the system contextual if and only if its canonical representation is contextual. As an illustration, we establish a criterion for contextuality of the canonical system consisting of all dichotomizations of a single pair of content-sharing categorical random variables. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Second quantum revolution: foundational questions’.

[1]  Jan-Åke Larsson,et al.  Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for an Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[2]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .

[3]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Probabilistic Contextuality in EPR/Bohm-type Systems with Signaling Allowed , 2014, 1406.0243.

[4]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Contextual Approach to Quantum Formalism , 2009 .

[5]  Arthur Fine,et al.  Joint distributions, quantum correlations, and commuting observables , 1982 .

[6]  Guido Bacciagaluppi,et al.  Leggett-Garg Inequalities, Pilot Waves and Contextuality , 2014, 1409.4104.

[7]  Ru Zhang,et al.  Is there contextuality in behavioural and social systems? , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Matt Jones,et al.  On contextuality in behavioural data , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Context-Content Systems of Random Variables: The Contextuality-by-Default Theory , 2015, 1511.03516.

[10]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Contextuality is about identity of random variables , 2014, 1405.2116.

[11]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Contextuality-by-Default: A Brief Overview of Ideas, Concepts, and Terminology , 2015, QI.

[12]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum Information Biology: From Information Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics to Applications in Molecular Biology and Cognitive Psychology , 2015, Foundations of Physics.

[13]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  The Principle of Supplementarity: A Contextual Probabilistic Viewpoint to Complementarity, the Interference of Probabilities and Incompatibility of Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 2005 .

[14]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[15]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Proof of a Conjecture on Contextuality in Cyclic Systems with Binary Variables , 2015, 1503.02181.

[16]  D. Kaszlikowski,et al.  Entropic test of quantum contextuality. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[17]  Jan-AAke Larsson,et al.  Contextuality in Three Types of Quantum-Mechanical Systems , 2014, 1411.2244.

[18]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality , 2011, 1102.0264.

[19]  Janne Kujala,et al.  Probabilistic foundations of contextuality , 2016, 1604.08412.

[20]  David W. Moore Measuring New Types of Question-Order Effects: Additive and Subtractive , 2002 .

[21]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Selectivity in Probabilistic Causality: Where Psychology Runs Into Quantum Physics , 2011, 1110.2388.

[22]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Question Order Model Supported by Empirical Tests of an A Priori and Precise Prediction , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Janne Kujala,et al.  Probability, Random Variables, and Selectivity , 2013, 1312.2239.

[24]  A. Cabello Simple explanation of the quantum violation of a fundamental inequality. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[25]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Instability of political preferences and the role of mass media: a dynamical representation in a quantum framework , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[26]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[27]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Contextuality-by-Default 2.0: Systems with Binary Random Variables , 2016, QI.

[28]  Víctor H. Cervantes,et al.  Advanced Analysis of Quantum Contextuality in a Psychophysical Double-Detection Experiment , 2016, 1611.04184.

[29]  Kohei Kishida,et al.  Contextuality, Cohomology and Paradox , 2015, CSL.

[30]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  When are probabilistic explanations possible? , 2005, Synthese.