Objective identification of technological returns to scale for data envelopment analysis models

Abstract In this paper, we consider one of the most critical problems for setting up a data envelopment analysis model: the identification of suitable returns to scale (RTS) for the data. We refer to it as the technological returns to scale (TRTS) to completely separate the technology's RTS from the DMU's RTS. The only existing objective approaches for the TRTS identification are statistically based. While they are supported by strong theories, they might be problematic in practice. In this paper, we introduce a novel and objective non-statistical method for the identification of the data's TRTS. Our proposed approach is called the Angles method since it utilizes the angles between the hyperplanes to calculate the gap between the constant and variable TRTS assumptions. The gap is calculated for both the increasing and the decreasing sections of the frontier. The larger such gap is, the more the TRTS approaches the increasing and/or decreasing assumptions. The novelty of the Angles method is that it determines the TRTS by using only the dataset without any statistical assumptions. Moreover, the introduced gap in the Angles method represents the rate of increase or decrease of the TRTS. For the validation test of the proposed method, we examine 6 one input/one output cases. Also, we test the method using real world data of a major Canadian Bank.

[1]  M. Asmild,et al.  Using DEA and Worst Practice DEA in Credit Risk Evaluation , 2004 .

[2]  Majid Soleimani-damaneh,et al.  A polynomial-time algorithm to estimate returns to scale in FDH models , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  R. Banker Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[4]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Finding DEA-efficient hyperplanes using MOLP efficient faces , 2011, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[5]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Returns to scale in different DEA models , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Finding weak defining hyperplanes of PPS of the BCC model , 2010 .

[7]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: An impact of U.S. clean air act on coal-fired power plants , 2013 .

[8]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Finding the piecewise linear frontier production function in data envelopment analysis , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[9]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Statistical Tests Based on Dea Efficiency Scores , 2011 .

[10]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: A new method based on goodness-of-fit , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Ratio-based RTS determination in weight-restricted DEA models , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Majid Soleimani-Damaneh,et al.  On the estimation of returns-to-scale in FDH models , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  M. Esmaeili,et al.  An alternative approach in the estimation of returns to scale under weight restrictions , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[14]  Ferat Sahin,et al.  A survey on feature selection methods , 2014, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[15]  V. V. Podinovski On the linearisation of reference technologies for testing returns to scale in FDH models , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Jing Luan,et al.  Data mining: Going beyond traditional statistics , 2006 .

[17]  Gang Yu,et al.  Construction of all DEA efficient surfaces of the production possibility set under the Generalized Data Envelopment Analysis Model , 1996 .

[18]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Measurement of Returns to Scale and Damages to Scale for DEA-based operational and environmental assessment: How to manage desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs? , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  John Douglas Divine,et al.  Efficiency analysis and management of not for profit and governmentally regulated organizations , 1986 .

[20]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Measurement of returns to scale using non-radial DEA models , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Non-parametric tests of returns to scale , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  On ratio-based RTS determination: An extension , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[24]  Emmanuel Thanssoulis,et al.  Setting Achievement Targets for School Children , 1999 .

[25]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  On Returns to Scale under Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2001 .

[26]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[27]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  Alireza Amirteimoori,et al.  Generating strong defining hyperplanes of the production possibility set in data envelopment analysis , 2012, Appl. Math. Lett..

[29]  David J. Hand,et al.  Deconstructing Statistical Questions , 1994 .

[30]  Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh,et al.  Negative data in data envelopment analysis: Efficiency analysis and estimating returns to scale , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[31]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[32]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[33]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Finding strong defining hyperplanes of Production Possibility Set , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[35]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases , 1996, AI Mag..

[36]  Jie Wu,et al.  Slacks-based measurement models for estimating returns to scale , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[37]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Hypothesis tests using data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[38]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Two-stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[39]  R. Banker Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis , 1984 .

[40]  Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo,et al.  Finding strong defining hyperplanes of PPS using multiplier form , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..