Evaluating the Experience of Children With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents Taking Part in an Artificial Pancreas Clinical Trial Over Multiple Days in a Diabetes Camp Setting

OBJECTIVE To explore the experiences of children with type 1 diabetes and their parents taking part in an artificial pancreas (AP) clinical trial during a 7-day summer camp. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A semistructured interview, composed of 14 questions based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was conducted at the end of the clinical trial. Participants also completed the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ, parent version) and the AP Acceptance Questionnaire. RESULTS Thirty children, aged 5–9 years, and their parents completed the study. A content analysis of the interviews showed that parents were focused on understanding the mechanisms, risks, and benefits of the new device, whereas the children were focused on the novelty of the new system. The parents’ main concerns about adopting the new system seemed related to the quality of glucose control. The mean scores of DTSQ subscales indicated general parents’ satisfaction (44.24 ± 5.99, range 32–53) and trustful views of diabetes control provided by the new system (7.8 ± 2.2, range 3–12). The AP Acceptance Questionnaire revealed that most parents considered the AP easy to use (70.5%), intended to use it long term (94.0%), and felt that it was apt to improve glucose control (67.0%). CONCLUSIONS Participants manifested a positive attitude toward the AP. Further studies are required to explore participants’ perceptions early in the AP development to individualize the new treatment as much as possible, and to tailor it to respond to their needs and values.

[1]  Nick Oliver,et al.  Psychosocial assessment of artificial pancreas (AP): commentary and review of existing measures and their applicability in AP research. , 2015, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[2]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[3]  Joost B L Hoekstra,et al.  Patients' Perception and Future Acceptance of an Artificial Pancreas , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[4]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[5]  Artificial pancreas (AP) clinical trial participants' acceptance of future AP technology. , 2014, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[6]  M. Phillip,et al.  Reduced Worries of Hypoglycaemia, High Satisfaction, and Increased Perceived Ease of Use after Experiencing Four Nights of MD-Logic Artificial Pancreas at Home (DREAM4) , 2015, Journal of diabetes research.

[7]  L. Gonder-Frederick,et al.  Closed-Loop Glucose Control: Psychological and Behavioral Considerations , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  Alda Troncone,et al.  Using computerized text analysis to assess communication within an Italian type 1 diabetes Facebook group , 2015, Health psychology open.

[9]  Future acceptance of an artificial pancreas in adults with type 1 diabetes. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[10]  C. Barr Taylor,et al.  Evaluation of computerized text analysis in an Internet breast cancer support group , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  W. Polonsky,et al.  Psychosocial Impact of the Bionic Pancreas During Summer Camp , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[12]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Comment on Doyle et al. Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas Systems: Engineering the Algorithms. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1191–1197 , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[13]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  2 month evening and night closed-loop glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes under free-living conditions: a randomised crossover trial. , 2015, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[14]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Parental attitudes towards overnight closed-loop glucose control in children with type 1 diabetes. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[15]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Closing the loop overnight at home setting: psychosocial impact for adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their parents , 2014, BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care.

[16]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Psychosocial aspects of closed‐ and open‐loop insulin delivery: closing the loop in adults with Type 1 diabetes in the home setting , 2015, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[17]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Randomized Summer Camp Crossover Trial in 5- to 9-Year-Old Children: Outpatient Wearable Artificial Pancreas Is Feasible and Safe , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[18]  C. Bradley,et al.  Measures of Psychological Well‐being and Treatment Satisfaction Developed from the Responses of People with Tablet‐treated Diabetes , 1990, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.