Optimal Enhancement Configuration of Silica Nanoparticles for Ultrasound Imaging and Automatic Detection at Conventional Diagnostic Frequencies

Objectives:To experimentally investigate the acoustical behavior of silica nanoparticles within conventional diagnostic ultrasound fields and to determine a suitable configuration, in terms of particle size and concentration, for their employment as targetable contrast agents. We also assessed the effectiveness of a novel method for automatic detection of targeted silica nanoparticles for future tissue typing applications. Materials and Methods:Silica nanospheres of variable size (160, 330, and 660 nm in diameter) and concentration (1010–1013 part/mL) were dispersed in different custom-designed agarose-based gel samples and imaged at 7.5 MHz with a conventional echograph linked to a research platform for radiofrequency signal acquisition. Off-line analysis included evaluation of backscattered ultrasound amplitude, image brightness, and nanoparticle automatic detection through radiofrequency signal processing. Results:Amplitude of nanoparticle-backscattered signals linearly increased with particle number concentration, but image brightness did not show the same trend, because the logarithmic compression caused the reaching of a “plateau” where brightness remained almost constant for further increments in particle concentration. On the other hand, both backscatter amplitude and image brightness showed significant increments when particle diameter was increased. Taking into account particle size constraints for tumor targeting (pore size of tumor endothelium and trapping effects because of reticulo-endothelial system limit the dimension of effectively employable particles to less than 380 nm), a suitable compromise is represented by the employment of 330-nm silica nanospheres at a concentration of about 1 to 2 × 1011 part/mL. These particles, in fact, showed the best combination of number concentration and diameter value to obtain an effective enhancement on conventional echographic images. Furthermore, also the sensitivity of the developed method for automatic nanoparticle detection had a maximum (72.8%) with 330-nm particles, whereas it was lower with both bigger and smaller particles (being equal to 64.1% and 17.5%, respectively). Conclusions:Silica nanoparticles at a diameter of about 330 nm are very promising contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and specific tumor targeting at conventional diagnostic frequencies, being in particular automatically detectable with high sensitivity already at low doses. Future studies will be carried out to assess the acoustic behavior of nanoparticles with different geometries/sizes and to improve sensitivity of the automatic detection algorithm.

[1]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Fluorescent Bacterial Magnetic Nanoparticles as Bimodal Contrast Agents , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Xueliang Pan,et al.  Nanoparticles as image enhancing agents for ultrasonography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Medical ultrasound imaging. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[4]  Flordeliza S Villanueva,et al.  Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease using ultrasound , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[5]  H. Maeda,et al.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[6]  Jun Liu,et al.  Biodegradable nanoparticles for targeted ultrasound imaging of breast cancer cells in vitro , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  R. Mittal,et al.  Measuring esophageal distension by high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound probe. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[8]  Shaoling Huang,et al.  Echogenic liposome compositions for increased retention of ultrasound reflectivity at physiologic temperature. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[9]  Vesna Zderic,et al.  Pulsatile flow phantom for ultrasound image-guided HIFU treatment of vascular injuries. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Surfactant-stabilized contrast agent on the nanoscale for diagnostic ultrasound imaging. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Alf Lamprecht,et al.  The targeting of surface modified silica nanoparticles to inflamed tissue in experimental colitis. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[12]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[13]  S. Caruthers,et al.  High Sensitivity: High-Resolution SPECT-CT/MR Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis in the Vx2 Model , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[14]  R. Jain,et al.  Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  L. Masotti,et al.  FEMMINA real-time, radio-frequency echo-signal equipment for testing novel investigation methods , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  Wadih Arap,et al.  Probing the structural and molecular diversity of tumor vasculature. , 2002, Trends in molecular medicine.

[17]  C. Barbé,et al.  Silica Particles: A Novel Drug‐Delivery System , 2004 .

[18]  Laetitia Gonzalez,et al.  Size-dependent cytotoxicity of monodisperse silica nanoparticles in human endothelial cells. , 2009, Small.

[19]  N. Slater,et al.  Effect of magnetite nanoparticle agglomerates on ultrasound induced inertial cavitation. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  S. Casciaro,et al.  A new fully automatic and robust algorithm for fast segmentation of liver tissue and tumors from CT scans , 2008, European Radiology.

[21]  Julia Xiaojun Zhao,et al.  Toxicity of luminescent silica nanoparticles to living cells. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[22]  P. Hardy,et al.  Nanotemplate-Engineered Nanoparticles Containing Gadolinium for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumors , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[23]  Susannah H Bloch,et al.  Application of Ultrasound to Selectively Localize Nanodroplets for Targeted Imaging and Therapy , 2006, Molecular imaging.

[24]  W. Stöber,et al.  Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range , 1968 .

[25]  Isabelle Tardy,et al.  BR55: A Lipopeptide-Based VEGFR2-Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Agent for Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[26]  Taeghwan Hyeon,et al.  Designed Fabrication of Silica‐Based Nanostructured Particle Systems for Nanomedicine Applications , 2008 .

[27]  M. Blomley,et al.  The role of ultrasound in molecular imaging. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  Tymish Y. Ohulchanskyy,et al.  Optical tracking of organically modified silica nanoparticles as DNA carriers: a nonviral, nanomedicine approach for gene delivery. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.