Cochlear sources and otoacoustic emissions.

Current understanding suggests that there are two different mechanisms by which otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are generated in the cochlea. These mechanisms include a nonlinear-distortion mechanism and a coherent-reflection mechanism. Distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs) are believed to include contributions from both mechanisms, while stimulus frequency OAEs (SFOAES), at least at low and moderate levels, are believed to be generated primarily by the coherent-reflection mechanism. In the case of DPOAEs, the interaction of the two mechanisms produces a series of alternating peaks and valleys in the response level when recorded in small frequency increments. This pattern of peaks and valleys typically is referred to as fine structure. There has been much speculation that the interaction of the two mechanisms and the resulting fine structure limits the clinical test performance of DPOAEs. There are few data to address this speculation. Here, we review the literature that describes the cochlear source mechanisms and their potential relationship to clinical applications. We then present results for preliminary data collected in a group of 10 normal-hearing subjects where we explore the influence of common approaches to setting DPOAE stimulus parameters on the resulting fine structure. These preliminary results suggest that, at the moderate stimulus levels used in clinical applications, each of the different stimulus parameters results in a similar amount of fine structure and, therefore, fine structure cannot be eliminated through manipulation of stimulus parameters. We also review the results of some preliminary efforts to identify stimulus parameters that can be used to record SFOAEs (OAEs generated by the reflection mechanism). The potential clinical applications of SFOAEs have received little attention in the literature. By identifying stimulus parameters producing robust responses in normal-hearing ears, it may be possible to more fully evaluate clinical applications of SFOAEs.

[1]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  S. Neely,et al.  Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  G. Long,et al.  The effect of stimulus-frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emission components. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[5]  M P Gorga,et al.  Latency and multiple sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Denis F. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Denis F. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D. H. Keefe,et al.  Simultaneous recording of stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions in human ears. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  S. Neely,et al.  From Laboratory to Clinic: A Large Scale Study of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Ears with Normal Hearing and Ears with Hearing Loss , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Geoffrey A. Manley,et al.  Active processes and otoacoustic emissions in hearing , 2007 .

[11]  A. M. Brown,et al.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Mechanisms of Mammalian Otoacoustic Emission and their Implications for the Clinical Utility of Otoacoustic Emissions , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[13]  D T Kemp,et al.  Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  D T Kemp,et al.  Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  S. Neely,et al.  A Validation and Potential Clinical Application of Multivariate Analyses of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Data , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions and the influence of the second DPOAE source. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  An Integrated View of Cochlear Mechanical Nonlinearities Observable from the Ear Canal , 1983 .

[19]  B. Vohr,et al.  A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: research design and results of the study. , 2005, American journal of audiology.

[20]  J. Guinan,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  G. K. Yates,et al.  The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1999, Hearing Research.

[22]  S. Neely,et al.  Clinical Test Performance of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions Using New Stimulus Conditions , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[23]  T. Janssen,et al.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Douglas H. Keefe,et al.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions revealed by suppression experiments and inverse fast Fourier transforms in normal ears. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  M. Lutman,et al.  The effect of suppression on the periodicity of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions: experimental data. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Acoustic distortion products (ADP) from the ears of term infants and young adults using low stimulus levels. , 1994, British journal of audiology.

[28]  Limitations in the use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in objective audiometry as the result of fine structure , 2004, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[29]  Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. II. Fine structure for different shapes of cochlear hearing loss. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  DPOAE component estimates and their relationship to hearing thresholds. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[31]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  D. Kemp,et al.  Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Dawn Konrad-Martin,et al.  Time-frequency analyses of transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: testing cochlear model predictions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Yvonne Sininger,et al.  Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Evaluation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission, Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission, and Auditory Brain Stem Response Test Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[35]  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler,et al.  Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) near 2f1−f2 removes DP-gram fine structure—Evidence for a secondary generator , 1998 .

[36]  Tiffany A. Johnson,et al.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  S. Neely,et al.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy , 1988, Hearing Research.

[39]  John J. Guinan,et al.  Mechanisms of Mammalian Otoacoustic Emission , 2008 .

[40]  S. Neely,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  S. Dhar,et al.  Effects of a Suppressor Tone on Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions Fine Structure: Why a Universal Suppressor Level Is Not a Practical Solution to Obtaining Single-Generator DP-Grams , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[42]  S Dhar,et al.  Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments, inverse fast Fourier transforms, and SFOAEs in impaired ears. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  R. A. Schmiedt,et al.  Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  R. Kalluri,et al.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Ben Lineton,et al.  Comparing two proposed measures of cochlear mechanical filter bandwidth based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[51]  S. Neely,et al.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured with amplitude-modulated suppressor tones (L). , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  D. H. Keefe,et al.  Audiometric Predictions Using Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Measurements , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[53]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mechanics of Hearing , 1983 .

[54]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Christopher A. Shera,et al.  The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig , 2003, Hearing Research.

[56]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Sumit Dhar,et al.  Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity. , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[58]  Effects of aging on the fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  R. Kalluri,et al.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.