Utilization of Lumbar Spinal Fusion in New York State: Trends and Disparities

Study Design. Retrospective review of an administrative database. Objective. To observe New York statewide trends in lumbar spine surgery and to compare utilization of fusion according to hospital size and patient population. Summary of Background Data. Over the last 30 years, studies have indicated increasing rates of spinal fusion procedures performed each year in the United States. There is no study investigating potential variability in this trend according to hospital volume. Methods. New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) administrative data were used to identify 228,882 lumbar spine surgery patients. New York State hospitals were categorized as low-, medium-, or high-volume and descriptive statistics were used to determine trends in spinal fusion. Results. The number of fusions per year increased 55% from 2005 to 2014. The ratio of fusion to nonfusion surgery increased from 0.88 to 2.67 at high-volume, from 0.84 to 2.30 at medium- volume, and from 0.66 to 1.52 at low-volume hospitals. In 2014, 22% of spine surgery patients at low-volume hospitals were either African Americans or Hispanics compared with 12% and 14% at high- and medium-volume hospitals, respectively. At high-volume hospitals, 33% of patients were privately insured and 3% had Medicare compared with 30% and 6% at low-volume hospitals. Conclusion. The annual number of lumbar spinal fusions continues to increase, especially at high- and medium-volume hospitals. The percentage of patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis that undergoes fusion ranges from 53.2 to 66.4% depending on hospital volume. Individual surgeon opinion, patient disease characteristics, and socioeconomic factors may affect surgical decision making. Caucasians and private insurance patients most often receive care at high-volume hospitals. Minorities and patients with Medicaid are over-represented at low-volume centers where fusions are less often performed. Accessibility to care at high-volume centers remains a major concern for these vulnerable populations. Level of Evidence: 3

[1]  Robert L Kane,et al.  Ninety-day mortality after intertrochanteric hip fracture: does provider volume matter? , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Joel A Finkelstein,et al.  The who, what and when of surgery for the degenerative lumbar spine: a population-based study of surgeon factors, surgical procedures, recent trends and reoperation rates. , 2009, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[3]  J. Bettany-Saltikov,et al.  Surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  R. Deyo,et al.  An International Comparison of Back Surgery Rates , 1994, Spine.

[5]  R A Deyo,et al.  Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. , 1993, Spine.

[6]  A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol , 2005, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[7]  Markku Heliövaara,et al.  Surgical or Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, Spine.

[8]  R. Deyo,et al.  Low Back Pain Hospitalization: Recent United States Trends and Regional Variations , 1994, Spine.

[9]  D. Skaggs,et al.  The Contribution of Hospital Volume, Payer Status, and Other Factors on the Surgical Outcomes of Scoliosis Patients: A Review of 3,606 Cases in the State of California , 2005, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[10]  R. Deyo,et al.  United States Trends in Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Conditions , 2005, Spine.

[11]  T. H.,et al.  The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery , 2006 .

[12]  Safdar N. Khan,et al.  Factors Predicting Hospital Stay, Operative Time, Blood Loss, and Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Revision Posterior Lumbar Spine Decompression, Fusion, and Segmental Instrumentation , 2002, Spine.

[13]  Elena Losina,et al.  Geographic Diversity of Low-Volume Hospitals in Total Knee Replacement: Implications For Regionalization Policies , 2006, Medical care.

[14]  C. Bono,et al.  Critical Analysis of Trends in Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease Over the Past 20 Years: Influence of Technique on Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcome , 2004, Spine.

[15]  R. El-Hawary,et al.  Update on evaluation and treatment of scoliosis. , 2014, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[16]  Jeffrey G Jarvik,et al.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. , 2010, JAMA.

[17]  S. Esses,et al.  Indications for lumbar spine fusion in the adult. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Understanding surgeon performance and improving patient outcomes. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Charles H. Cho,et al.  Guideline summary review: An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[20]  M. Mariconda,et al.  Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective comparative study with conservatively treated patients. , 2002, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[21]  D. Grob,et al.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  G. Úrrutia,et al.  Surgery Versus Conservative Treatment for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2011, Spine.

[24]  C. Ko,et al.  Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for total knee replacement. , 2008, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[25]  Mostafa El-Feky,et al.  Lumbar spinal fusion , 2014, Radiopaedia.org.

[26]  Brett Hanscom,et al.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  R. Brook,et al.  Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. , 2006, JAMA.

[28]  P. Heagerty,et al.  Population-Based Trends in Volumes and Rates of Ambulatory Lumbar Spine Surgery , 2006, Spine.

[29]  M. Abdelnoor,et al.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study. , 2000, Spine.

[30]  J. Katz,et al.  Lumbar Spinal Fusions: Surgical Rates, Costs, and Complications , 1995, Spine.

[31]  D. Staiger,et al.  Technology Adoption from Hybrid Corn to Beta Blockers , 2005 .

[32]  S. Missios,et al.  The association of regional intensity of neurosurgical care with spinal fusion surgery in the USA , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[33]  D. Singer,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 8 to 10 Year Results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study , 2005, Spine.

[34]  H. An,et al.  Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Decompressive Laminectomy and Arthrodesis with and without Spinal Instrumentation * , 2018, 50 Landmark Papers.

[35]  V K Goel,et al.  Epidemiology introduction. 1995 Focus Issue Meeting on Fusion. , 1995, Spine.

[36]  H N Herkowitz,et al.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[37]  Robert A Hart,et al.  Variation in Surgical Decision Making For Degenerative Spinal Disorders. Part II: Cervical Spine , 2005, Spine.

[38]  A. Nachemson Fusion for low back pain and sciatica. , 1985, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[39]  H Davis,et al.  Increasing Rates of Cervical and Lumbar Spine Surgery in the United States, 1979–1990 , 1994, Spine.

[40]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008 , 2012, Spine.

[41]  H. Horiguchi,et al.  Impact of hospital volume on postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality after musculoskeletal tumor surgery: analysis of a national administrative database. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[42]  Richard L Skolasky,et al.  The Effects of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on Postoperative Complications After LumbarSpine Surgery , 2011, Spine.

[43]  R A Deyo,et al.  An Assessment of Surgery for Spinal Stenosis: Time Trends, Geographic Variations, Complications, and Reoperations , 1996, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[44]  Russell D MacDonald,et al.  Pro/con debate: Do the benefits of regionalized critical care delivery outweigh the risks of interfacility patient transport? , 2009, Critical care.

[45]  M. Mackay,et al.  1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Decompressive Laminectomy and Arthrodesis With and Without Spinal Instrumentation , 1997, Spine.

[46]  A. Hilibrand,et al.  Variation in Surgical Decision Making for Degenerative Spinal Disorders. Part I: Lumbar Spine , 2005, Spine.

[47]  L. Hutzler,et al.  The Regionalization of Lumbar Spine Procedures in New York State: A 10-Year Analysis , 2016, Spine.

[48]  B. Gray,et al.  Racial and ethnic differences in the use of high-volume hospitals and surgeons. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[49]  R. Deyo,et al.  5‐Year Reoperation Rates After Different Types of Lumbar Spine Surgery , 1998, Spine.

[50]  T. Witham,et al.  The impact of provider volume on the outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[51]  L. Kanim,et al.  Nationwide Trends in the Surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2013, Spine.

[52]  Harry E Rubash,et al.  Orthopaedic Procedure Volume and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.