The paper presents a new model of founder’s choice between democracy and autocracy in corporate governance and point out that there is a life-cycle effect on the choice of governance mode. At the start-up period, the autocracy mode is more efficiency. However, autocracy requires the founder being as the CEO to have sufficient own capitals. If external finance is needed, the founder would respond for higher capital cost as compensation for the manager’s control benefit rents behavior and the control power loss of minority shareholders. Therefore, the capability of entrepreneur should be greater than the average managerial level in the professional manager market and the expected return of the “project” should be higher than the average level of the market as well. It is concluded that own funds and the founder’s capability are substitutes.
[1]
Tobias J. Moskowitz,et al.
Testing Agency Theory with Entrepreneur Effort and Wealth
,
2005
.
[2]
Clifford G. Holderness,et al.
Private benefits from control of public corporations
,
1989
.
[3]
Harry DeAngelo,et al.
Managerial ownership of voting rights: A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock☆
,
1985
.
[4]
Denis Gromb,et al.
Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm
,
1997
.
[5]
D. Mueller,et al.
Insider ownership, ownership concentration and investment performance: An international comparison
,
2008
.
[6]
Radhakrishnan Gopalan,et al.
The Entrepreneur's Choice between Private and Public Ownership
,
2006
.