Perception of affordances for standing on an inclined surface depends on height of center of mass

We investigated whether perception of affordances for standing on an inclined surface depended on the height of center of mass of the perceiver-actor. Participants adjusted the angle of inclination of a surface until they felt that it was just barely possible for them to stand on that surface. They performed this task while wearing a backpack apparatus to which masses were attached in one of three configurations—high-mass, low-mass, and no-mass. Moreover, participants performed this task by viewing the inclined surface or by probing it with a hand-held rod (while blindfolded). Perception of affordances for standing on the inclined surface reflected the changes in center of mass brought on by the weighted backpack apparatus (the perceptual boundary occurred at a smaller angle of inclination in the high-mass condition than in the low-mass condition and in the no-mass condition). Moreover, perception of this affordance reflected such changes both when the surface was viewed and when the surface was probed with a hand-held rod (while blindfolded). The results highlight that perception of affordances is dynamic and task-dependent and suggest that the stimulation patterns that support perception of affordances are invariant and modality-independent.

[1]  Raôul R. D. Oudejans,et al.  Changes in the perception of action possibilities while climbing to fatigue on a climbing wall , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  A. Chemero An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[3]  Gregory Burton,et al.  Non-Neural Extensions of haptic Sensitivity , 1993 .

[4]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Effortful touch with minimal movement , 1992 .

[5]  David Bordwell,et al.  Moving Image Theory: Ecological Considerations , 2005 .

[6]  Jeffrey B. Wagman,et al.  Perceiving Affordances for Aperture Crossing for the Person-Plus-Object System , 2005 .

[7]  Gonzalo E. Reyes,et al.  The Logical Foundations of Cognition , 1994 .

[8]  M. Turvey,et al.  Ecological foundations of cognition. I: Symmetry and specificity of animal-environment systems , 1999 .

[9]  M. Turvey Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology , 1992 .

[10]  J. Wagman,et al.  Perception of whether an object can be carried through an aperture depends on anticipated speed. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[11]  Jeffrey B Wagman,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Kinetic Potential Influences Visual and Remote Haptic Perception of Affordances for Standing on an Inclined Surface , 2022 .

[12]  M. Turvey Space (and Its Perception): The First and Final Frontier , 2004 .

[13]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[14]  S. Runeson On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[15]  Karen E Adolph,et al.  Gauging possibilities for action based on friction underfoot. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Konczak,et al.  Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  G. Bingham,et al.  Hefting for a maximum distance throw: a smart perceptual mechanism. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Task-specific devices and the perceptual bottleneck☆ , 1988 .

[19]  M. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving 'Walk-on-able' Slopes , 1992 .

[20]  Takahiro Higuchi,et al.  Visual estimation of spatial requirements for locomotion in novice wheelchair users. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  James A. Balliett,et al.  What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. , 1990 .

[22]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  On specification and the senses , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  E. Gibson,et al.  An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development , 2000 .

[24]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Raoul M Bongers,et al.  Variations of Tool and Task Characteristics Reveal That Tool-Use Postures Are Anticipated , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  J A Kelso,et al.  The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Claudia Carello,et al.  Haptic and Visual Perception of an Affordance for Upright Posture , 1994 .

[30]  E. Gibson,et al.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1973 .

[31]  K. Adolph,et al.  Learning in the development of infant locomotion. , 1997, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[32]  Naoya Hirose,et al.  The Process of Adaptation to Perceiving New Action Capabilities , 2001 .

[33]  Anthony M. Avolio,et al.  Walking infants adapt locomotion to changing body dimensions. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Jeffrey B. Wagman,et al.  Affordances and Inertial Constraints on Tool Use , 2001 .