The future is now: Technology's impact on the practice of genetic counseling

Smartphones, artificial intelligence, automation, digital communication, and other types of technology are playing an increasingly important role in our daily lives. It is no surprise that technology is also shaping the practice of medicine, and more specifically the practice of genetic counseling. While digital tools have been part of the practice of medical genetics for decades, such as internet‐ or CD‐ROM‐based tools like Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man and Pictures of Standard Syndromes and Undiagnosed Malformations in the 1980s, the potential for emerging tools to change how we practice and the way patients consume information is startling. Technology has the potential to aid in at‐risk patient identification, assist in generating a differential diagnosis, improve efficiency in medical history collection and risk assessment, provide educational support for patients, and streamline follow‐up. Here we review the historic and current uses of technology in genetic counseling, identify challenges to integration, and propose future applications of technology that can shape the practice of genetic counseling.

[1]  C. Wade,et al.  Preferences for the provision of whole genome sequencing services among young adults , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  PancPRO: risk assessment for individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  E. Topol,et al.  Adapting to Artificial Intelligence: Radiologists and Pathologists as Information Specialists. , 2016, JAMA.

[4]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Whole pelvic helical tomotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: technical implementation of IMRT with helical tomothearapy , 2009, Radiation oncology.

[5]  A. Rahm,et al.  Alternate Service Delivery Models in Cancer Genetic Counseling: A Mini-Review , 2016, Front. Oncol..

[6]  Elisabetta Ceretti,et al.  Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  R. Bennett The Practical Guide to the Genetic Family History , 1999 .

[8]  P Strømme The diagnosis of syndromes by use of a dysmorphology database. , 1991, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[9]  Kensaku Kawamoto,et al.  Clinical decision support for genetically guided personalized medicine: a systematic review , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  D. L. Doyle,et al.  Standardized Human Pedigree Nomenclature: Update and Assessment of the Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors , 2008, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[11]  J. Rashbass Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. , 1995, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  R. Calvo,et al.  Application of Synchronous Text-Based Dialogue Systems in Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome. , 2006, JAMA.

[14]  S. Amladi,et al.  Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man 'OMIM'. , 2003, Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology.

[15]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors , 2004, Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.

[16]  Ashley R. Bergeron,et al.  A randomized trial of a prenatal genetic testing interactive computerized information aid , 2014, Prenatal diagnosis.

[17]  Patricia Z. Page,et al.  Creation of a National, At-home Model for Ashkenazi Jewish Carrier Screening , 2015, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[18]  H. Bass London Dysmorphology Database, London Neurogenetics Database & Dysmorphology Photo Library on CD-ROM , 2002 .

[19]  C. Childers,et al.  National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women With a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Nikki A. Hawkins,et al.  Characteristics associated with genetic counseling referral and BRCA1/2 testing among women in a large integrated health system , 2014, Genetics in Medicine.

[21]  J. Roberts,et al.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies , 2013, Current Genetic Medicine Reports.

[22]  K. Brain,et al.  A pilot study of telegenetics , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  M. Littleton-Kearney,et al.  Interventions to improve patient education regarding multifactorial genetic conditions: A systematic review , 2009, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[24]  Megan Doerr,et al.  Formative Evaluation of Clinician Experience with Integrating Family History-Based Clinical Decision Support into Clinical Practice , 2014, Journal of personalized medicine.

[25]  R McMahon NEW SOFTWARE: Cyrillic 2.0 for Pedigree Drawing , 1996 .

[26]  K. Armstrong,et al.  Diffusion of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in Primary Care , 2009, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[27]  Ray Bert,et al.  Learning by Doing: The Real Connection between Innovation, Wages, and Wealth , By James Bessen. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 2015 , 2015 .

[28]  E. Jabs,et al.  Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[29]  Jeffrey Wood,et al.  Introducing a Comprehensive Informatics Framework to Promote Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Chemoprevention in the Primary Care Setting , 2017, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[30]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Estimating CDKN2A carrier probability and personalizing cancer risk assessments in hereditary melanoma using MelaPRO. , 2010, Cancer research.

[31]  Stephanie A Cohen,et al.  Analysis of Advantages, Limitations, and Barriers of Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models , 2016, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[32]  R Nick Bryan,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: Threat or Boon to Radiologists? , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[33]  D Schorderet,et al.  SYNDROC: microcomputer based differential diagnosis of malformation patterns. , 1985, Archives of disease in childhood.

[34]  S. Wyatt,et al.  Counseling Customers: Emerging Roles for Genetic Counselors in the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Market , 2013, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[35]  Frank C. Day,et al.  Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling , 2017, BMC Medical Education.

[36]  E H Shortliffe,et al.  Watson for Oncology and breast cancer treatment recommendations: agreement with an expert multidisciplinary tumor board , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[37]  W. Thompson,et al.  The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer , 1996, Cancer.

[38]  L. Simmons,et al.  Patient engagement as a risk factor in personalized health care: a systematic review of the literature on chronic disease , 2014, Genome Medicine.

[39]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[40]  A model for patient-direct screening and referral for familial cancer risk , 2016, Familial Cancer.