Valve choice for aortic valve replacement in patients between 50 and 70 years of age

There is a lack of clarity on whether to choose a mechanical or a bioprosthetic valve for aortic valve replacement in patients between the age of 50 and 70.

[1]  Min‐Seok Kim,et al.  Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years: Analysis using Korean National Big Data , 2022, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[2]  U. Sartipy,et al.  Critical appraisal of a registry study: aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50–69 years , 2022, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

[3]  T. Walther,et al.  Surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-69 years-insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). , 2022, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[4]  Jae-Sung Choi,et al.  Bail‐out coil embolization for a pseudoaneurysm of aortic sinotubular junction in a patient with Behcet's disease after receiving multiple aortic operations , 2022, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[5]  M. Mildner,et al.  Mechanical aortic valve prostheses offer a survival benefit in 50–65 year olds: AUTHEARTVISIT study , 2021, European journal of clinical investigation.

[6]  B. Prendergast,et al.  2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. , 2021, European heart journal.

[7]  J. F. Valderrama,et al.  Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-65 years: the ANDALVALVE study. , 2019, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[8]  M. Baiocchi,et al.  Mechanical or Biologic Prostheses for Aortic‐Valve and Mitral‐Valve Replacement , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Franco‐Cereceda,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with mechanical vs. biological prostheses in patients aged 50-69 years. , 2016, European heart journal.

[10]  L. Cohn,et al.  Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  D. Adams,et al.  Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. , 2014, JAMA.

[12]  Jennifer Taylor,et al.  ESC/EACTS Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. , 2012, European heart journal.

[13]  C. Vosa,et al.  Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  T. Sundt,et al.  Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.