Proxemics and performance: Subjective human evaluations of autonomous sociable robot distance and social signal understanding

An objective of an autonomous sociable robot is to meet the needs and preferences of a human user. However, this can sometimes be at the expense of the robot's own ability to understand social signals produced by the user. In particular, human preferences of distance (proxemics) to the robot can have significant impact on the performance rates of its automated speech and gesture recognition systems. In this work, we investigated how people perceive a sociable robot based on its performance at different locations. We performed an experiment in which a robot's ability to understand social signals was artificially attenuated across distance; robot maximum, minimum, and average performance rates were also varied. Participants (N = 160) instructed a robot using speech and pointing gestures, and then responded to a questionnaire to provide their subjective evaluations of the robot.We identified significant relationships between robot performance and user perceptions of robot competence, anthropomorphism, engagement, likability, and technology adoption; we identified no relationship between human-robot distance and subjective measures, which contrasts related work. Our results have significant implications for autonomous sociable robot design.

[1]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[2]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Social interactions in HRI: the robot view , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[3]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Towards a computational method of scaling a robot's behavior via proxemics , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[4]  Akinori Ito,et al.  Influence of the Size Factor of a Mobile Robot Moving Toward a Human on Subjective Acceptable Distance , 2011 .

[5]  Christian Heath,et al.  IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication , 2009 .

[6]  Edward T. Hall,et al.  A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior1 , 1963 .

[7]  M. Matarić,et al.  Robots Have Needs Too: People Adapt Their Proxemic Preferences to Improve Autonomous Robot Recognition of Human Social Signals , 2015 .

[8]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Toward Robot Adaptation of Human Speech and Gesture Parameters in a Unified Framework of Proxemics and Multimodal Communication , 2015 .

[10]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Perceptual Models of Human-Robot Proxemics , 2014, ISER.

[11]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  The influence of height in robot-mediated communication , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Dylan F. Glas,et al.  How to Approach Humans?-Strategies for Social Robots to Initiate Interaction- , 2010 .

[14]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Human approach distances to a mechanical-looking robot with different robot voice styles , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[15]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[16]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[17]  E. Hall The Silent Language , 1959 .

[18]  Mohammad Obaid,et al.  Investigating the influence of culture on proxemic behaviors for humanoid robots , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[19]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[20]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Automated Proxemic Feature Extraction and Behavior Recognition: Applications in Human-Robot Interaction , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[21]  A. Murata Basic characteristics of human's distance estimation , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[22]  M. Walters The Design Space for Robot Appearance and Behaviour for Social Robot Companions , 2008 .

[23]  Maja J. Matarić,et al.  Representations of Proxemic Behavior for Human-Machine Interaction , 2012 .

[24]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics , 2009 .

[25]  Elena Torta,et al.  Design of a Parametric Model of Personal Space for Robotic Social Navigation , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[26]  Justin W. Hart,et al.  No fair!!: an interaction with a cheating robot , 2010, HRI 2010.