A production methodology for agile manufacturing in a high turnover environment

An analysis of the US border manufacturing industry revealed that, while a plentiful supply of inexpensive labor is available, there are high levels of absenteeism and turnover. This in turn has affected this industry’s ability to implement lean and agile manufacturing production environments. It was argued that lower inventory levels and quicker response time to market fluctuations are required for these manufacturers to stay competitive. Yet, without careful consideration of the idiosyncrasies of the infrastructure, the change to leaner and more agile manufacturing could destroy some of these plants. The high levels of absenteeism and turnover, which have a direct bearing on the low and variable product yield rates, could cause an agile and lean production system to fail. Yet this research has shown that a recursive, pull‐type production control system that will meet the required daily quota and minimize inventory while accounting for high levels of absenteeism and turnover that directly affect workstation yield rates would be advantageous. That is, a US border manufacturer can become leaner and more agile in spite of the drawbacks that are germane to the US border manufacturing industry.

[1]  Mario G. Beruvides,et al.  EFFECTS OF HIGH LABOUR TURNOVER IN A SERIAL ASSEMBLY ENVIRONMENT , 1997 .

[2]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[3]  Ellwyn R. Stoddard,et al.  Maquila: Assembly Plants in Northern Mexico , 1987 .

[4]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[5]  P. Kidd Agile Manufacturing: a strategy for the 21st century , 1995 .

[6]  Yasuhiro Monden,et al.  Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-In-Time , 1993 .

[7]  Sheldon R. Smith,et al.  The realities of operating in Mexico: an exploration of manufacturing and logistics issues , 1995 .

[8]  Christian Berggren Alternatives to Lean Production: Work Organization in the Swedish Auto Industry , 1993 .

[9]  Scott T Hutchinson Managing work time variability caused by labor turnover in a serial assembly line , 1995 .

[10]  S. Maguire Employer and occupational tenure: 1991 update. , 1993, Monthly labor review.

[11]  B. K. Lambert,et al.  ADAPTIVE PULL-TYPE PRODUCTION CONTROL USING KALMAN FILTERS , 1997 .

[12]  Baback Yazdani Book reviewToyota production system: an integrated approach to Just-In-Time (2nd ed): Yasuhiro Monden Chapman & Hall, London (1994) 423 pp, £39.95 ISBN 0-412-58220-1 , 1995 .

[13]  S.M.R. James-Moore Agility is easy, but effective agile manufacturing is not , 1995 .

[14]  G. Lucker The Hidden Cost of Worker Turnover: A Case Study in the In-Bond Industry in Mexico , 1987 .

[15]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Design for agile assembly: An operational perspective , 1997 .