Uncertainty in the response of transpiration to CO2 and implications for climate change

While terrestrial precipitation is a societally highly relevant climate variable, there is little consensus among climate models about its projected 21st century changes. An important source of precipitable water over land is plant transpiration. Plants control transpiration by opening and closing their stomata. The sensitivity of this process to increasing CO2 concentrations is uncertain. To assess the impact of this uncertainty on future climate, we perform experiments with an intermediate complexity Earth System Climate Model (UVic ESCM) for a range of model-imposed transpiration-sensitivities to CO2. Changing the sensitivity of transpiration to CO2 causes simulated terrestrial precipitation to change by −10% to +27% by 2100 under a high emission scenario. This study emphasises the importance of an improved assessment of the dynamics of environmental impact on vegetation to better predict future changes of the terrestrial hydrological and carbon cycles.

[1]  Marika M. Holland,et al.  Simulating the ice‐thickness distribution in a coupled climate model , 2001 .

[2]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Importance of carbon dioxide physiological forcing to future climate change , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[4]  Katrin J. Meissner,et al.  The role of land surface dynamics in glacial inception: a study with the UVic Earth System Model , 2003 .

[5]  K. Pilegaard,et al.  How is water-use efficiency of terrestrial ecosystems distributed and changing on Earth? , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[6]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[7]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Robustness and uncertainty in terrestrial ecosystem carbon response to CMIP5 climate change projections , 2012 .

[8]  Hans Peter Schmid,et al.  Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise , 2013, Nature.

[9]  Naota Hanasaki,et al.  GSWP-2 Multimodel Analysis and Implications for Our Perception of the Land Surface , 2006 .

[10]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Temporal and among‐site variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level , 2009 .

[11]  F. Wentz,et al.  How Much More Rain Will Global Warming Bring? , 2007, Science.

[12]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[13]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  The Partitioning of Evapotranspiration into Transpiration, Soil Evaporation, and Canopy Evaporation in a GCM: Impacts on Land–Atmosphere Interaction , 2007 .

[14]  Andrew J. Weaver,et al.  An atmospheric energy-moisture balance model: Climatology, interpentadal climate change, and coupling to an ocean general circulation model , 1996 .

[15]  Hervé Cochard,et al.  An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. , 2010, Plant, cell & environment.

[16]  R. Betts,et al.  The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity , 1999 .

[17]  Alvaro Montenegro,et al.  Lifetime of Anthropogenic Climate Change: Millennial Time Scales of Potential CO2 and Surface Temperature Perturbations , 2009 .

[18]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability , 2011 .

[19]  A. Oschlies,et al.  A new marine ecosystem model for the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model , 2012 .

[20]  R. Leuning,et al.  Carbon and water fluxes over a temperate Eucalyptus forest and a tropical wet/dry savanna in Australia: measurements and comparison with MODIS remote sensing estimates , 2005 .

[21]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Historical and idealized climate model experiments: an intercomparison of Earth system models of intermediate complexity , 2013 .

[22]  K.,et al.  Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2012 .

[23]  F. Bongers,et al.  No growth stimulation of tropical trees by 150 years of CO2 fertilization but water-use efficiency increased , 2015 .

[24]  David P. Keller,et al.  Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario , 2014, Nature Communications.

[25]  Sanjiv Kumar,et al.  Evaluation of Temperature and Precipitation Trends and Long-Term Persistence in CMIP5 Twentieth-Century Climate Simulations , 2013 .

[26]  B. Kruijt,et al.  Effects of rising atmospheric CO2 on evapotranspiration and soil moisture : A practical approach for the Netherlands , 2008 .

[27]  Richard Harding,et al.  A canopy conductance and photosynthesis model for use in a GCM land surface scheme , 1998 .

[28]  J. Monteith.  Evaporation and surface temperature , 2007 .

[29]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[30]  Fei Chen,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Coupled Photosynthesis-Based Gas Exchange Evapotranspiration Model (GEM) for Mesoscale Weather Forecasting Applications , 2009 .

[31]  A. Bodas‐Salcedo,et al.  Physically Consistent Responses of the Global Atmospheric Hydrological Cycle in Models and Observations , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.