Meta-Analysis of 143 Adolescent Drug Prevention Programs: Quantitative Outcome Results of Program Participants Compared to a Control or Comparison Group

Presented is a meta-analysis of the outcome results for 143 adolescent drug prevention programs to identify the most effective program modalities for reducing teenage drug use. Glass' et al. (1981) meta-analysis techniques provided a systematic approach for the accumulation, quantification and integration of the numerous research findings. Five major modalities were identified and their effect sizes computed for five distinctly different outcomes: Knowledge, Attitudes, Use, Skills and Behavior measures. The magnitude of the effect size was found dependent on the outcome measure employed and the rigor of the experimental design. These factors were controlled for through use of a standard regression analysis. Peer Programs were found to show a definite superiority for the magnitude of the effect size obtained on all outcome measures. On the ultimate criteria of drug use, Peer Programs were significantly different than the combined results of all the remaining programs (p < .0005). Peer Programs maintained high effect size for alcohol, soft drugs and hard drugs, as well as for cigarette use. Recommendations are made concerning the effectiveness of the underlying theoretical assumption for the different program modalities. Future programming implications are discussed as Peer Programs were identified as effective for the average school-based adolescent population, but the Alternatives programs were shown to be highly successful for the “at risk” adolescents such as drug abusers, juvenile delinquents or students having school problems.

[1]  G. N. Braucht,et al.  Prevention of Problem Drinking among Youth , 1984 .

[2]  Joel M. Moskowitz,et al.  Teacher training in affective education for the primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse. , 1984, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[3]  Joel M. Moskowitz,et al.  Evaluation of a substance abuse prevention program for junior high school students. , 1984, The International journal of the addictions.

[4]  J. Berman,et al.  The efficacy of cognitive behavior therapies: a quantitative review of the research evidence. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  M. Goodstadt,et al.  Three approaches to alcohol education. , 1983, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[6]  D. P. Hartmann,et al.  Meta-analysis: Techniques, applications, and functions. , 1983 .

[7]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  Identifying Features of Effective Open Education , 1982 .

[8]  Joel M. Moskowitz,et al.  Process and Outcome Evaluation of a Drug Education Course , 1982 .

[9]  B. Bry,et al.  Reducing the incidence of adolescent problems through preventive intervention: one- and five-year follow-up , 1982, American journal of community psychology.

[10]  G. C. Chan,et al.  An evaluation of two school-based alcohol education programs. , 1982, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[11]  N. Gordon,et al.  Adolescent Drinking: Issues and Research , 1982 .

[12]  G. Botvin.  Broadening the Focus of Smoking Prevention Strategies , 1982 .

[13]  Sehwan Kim.  An Evaluation of Ombudsman Primary Prevention Program on Student Drug Abuse , 1981 .

[14]  Joel M. Moskowitz,et al.  A Review of 127 Drug Abuse Prevention Program Evaluations , 1981 .

[15]  R. Dembo.  Critical issues and experiences in drug treatment and prevention evaluation. , 1981, The International journal of the addictions.

[16]  S. Walfish,et al.  Drug and alcohol education programs: a review of outcome studies. , 1980, The International journal of the addictions.

[17]  David B. Pillemer,et al.  Synthesizing Outcomes: How to Use Research Evidence from Many Studies. , 1980 .

[18]  Michael S. Goodstadt,et al.  Drug Education—A Turn on or a Turn Off? , 1980 .

[19]  B. Bry,et al.  The preventive effects of early intervention on the attendance and grades of urban adolescents. , 1980 .

[20]  M. Smith.  Publication bias and meta-analysis , 1980 .

[21]  M.S.W. H Staulcup,et al.  A Review of Federal Primary Alcoholism Prevention Projects , 1979 .

[22]  B. Bry,et al.  Evaluating and improving prevention programs: a strategy from drug abuse. , 1979, Evaluation and program planning.

[23]  R. Blum,et al.  Drug Education: Further Results and Recommendations , 1978 .

[24]  B. Bry.  Research design in drug abuse prevention: review and recommendations. , 1978, The International journal of the addictions.

[25]  M. Goodstadt,et al.  Alcohol and Drug Education: Models and Outcomes , 1978, Health education monographs.

[26]  M. Mittelmark,et al.  Increasing the validity of self-reports of behavior in a smoking in children investigation. , 1977 .

[27]  B. Tuchfeld,et al.  Drinking levels and problem drinking among junior and senior high-school students. , 1976, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[28]  R. M. Berberian,et al.  The Effectiveness of Drug Education Programs: A Critical Review , 1976, Health education monographs.

[29]  M. Wong,et al.  Drug Education to Date: A Review , 1976 .

[30]  R. Blum,et al.  Drug education : results and recommendations , 1976 .

[31]  T. O'rourke,et al.  Assessment of the Effectiveness of the N.Y. State Drug Curriculum Guide with Respect to Drug Attitudes , 1974 .

[32]  R. Stuart,et al.  Teaching facts about drugs: pushing or preventing? , 1974, Journal of educational psychology.

[33]  G. N. Braucht,et al.  Drug education. A review of goals, approaches and effectiveness, and a paradigm for evaluation. , 1973, Quarterly journal of studies on alcohol.