Enhancing Practicing Primary School Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Technology

This paper describes the frameworks and cognitive tools that have been developed to enhance practising teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in primary school technology education. The frameworks evolved from our research that firstly examined existing teaching practices, secondly enhanced formative interactions and thirdly enhanced summative assessment strategies. The evidence gained over the three years demonstrated how the effective use of frameworks could be utilised to enhance teacher pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). How we see learning is of prime importance in examining the development of teacher pedagogical content knowledge. A sociocultural view of learning is taken where human mental processes are situated within their historical, cultural and institutional setting. In the research project we strongly emphasised the need for teachers to build a knowledge base for teaching technology. Critical aspects identified as enhancing PCK included: negotiated intervention, planning frameworks, reflection on case studies, workshops and support in classrooms, appropriate resources, teacher agreement meetings, portfolios of student work and summative profiles. The increased PCK resulted in: enhanced teacher knowledge about technology including the nature of technology, areas of technology and specific technological knowledge, changed pedagogical approaches, enhanced teacher student interaction, refinement of appropriate learning outcomes, critical decision making, improved teacher confidence, and enhanced student learning. Seven characteristics or features of pedagogical content knowledge that we believe are important for effective teaching and learning in technology are presented.

[1]  B. Rogoff.  Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[2]  Voyages of Discovery , 1954 .

[3]  R. Duschl,et al.  Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms. , 1997 .

[4]  Caroline Gipps,et al.  Chapter 10: Socio-Cultural Aspects of Assessment , 1999 .

[5]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[6]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[7]  J. Wertsch.  Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action , 1992 .

[8]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[9]  Alister Jones,et al.  The Development of a National Curriculum in Technology for New Zealand , 2003 .

[10]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[11]  Judy Moreland,et al.  Enhancing Teachers' Technological Knowledge and Assessment Practices to Enhance Student Learning in Technology: A Two-year Classroom Study , 2001 .

[12]  R. Butler.  Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. , 1987 .

[13]  P. Black,et al.  Testing : friend or foe? the theory and practice of assessment and testing / Paul J. Black , 1998 .

[14]  Alister Jones,et al.  Recent Research in Learning Technological Concepts and Processes , 1997 .

[15]  Judy Moreland,et al.  Emerging Assessment Practices in an Emergent Curriculum: Implications for Technology , 2000 .

[16]  Paul Black,et al.  Testing: Friend or Foe?: Theory and Practice of Assessment and Testing , 1997 .

[17]  D. Sadler,et al.  Formative Assessment: revisiting the territory , 1998 .

[18]  Y. Mavrommatis,et al.  Understanding Assessment in the Classroom: phases of the assessment process — the assessment episode , 1997 .

[19]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  Synthesis of Research on Good Teaching: Insights from the Work of the Institute for Research on Teaching. , 1988 .

[20]  Jo Boaler,et al.  Participation, Knowledge and Beliefs: A Community Perspective on Mathematics Learning , 1999 .

[21]  M. James,et al.  Assessment and Learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment , 1997 .

[22]  Julie Cess-Newsome,et al.  Secondary Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs about Subject Matter and their Impact on Instruction , 1999 .