Distributional justice in solar energy implementation in India: The case of Charanka solar park

Large scale renewable energy developments, although seen as environmentally good, also have the potential to damage a community’s well-being if the distribution of outcomes of the development, both good and bad, is unfair. Inequality in the distribution of benefits and costs, especially when some sections of a community benefit at the expense of others, can divide communities, damage relationships, and result in conflicts. In recent years, a considerable number of empirical studies examining the controversies over distributional inequalities in renewable energy practices have emerged. However, most of them have focused on the developed world; there has been little research in the context of the Global South, where large scale and rapid development of solar energy especially is anticipated to contribute to economic development and relieve energy poverty. This paper provides an empirical case study of ‘Charanka Solar Park’ in the Indian state of Gujarat. The objective is to qualitatively analyse the distributional concerns in the implementation of the large scale solar park, developed in a remote rural location. The research illustrates how the benefits of renewable energy development tend to accrue at regional and national level whilst local host communities bear adverse consequences. Distributional inequalities also occurred at the local scale in Charanka, where while the upper caste and economically better of sectors of the community were able to take opportunities, while vulnerable pastoralists and small farmers suffered the most from loss of land resources and associated livelihoods. Thus, the uneven distribution of benefits arising from the solar park development reinforced and deepened existing inequalities. The paper concludes by discussing how distributional injustice in such developments might be ameliorated in the future.

[1]  Snigdha Chakrabarti,et al.  Rural electrification programme with solar energy in remote region-a case study in an island , 2002 .

[2]  David M. Smith,et al.  Geography and Social Justice , 1994 .

[3]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England , 2010 .

[4]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .

[5]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[6]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[7]  David Toke,et al.  Wind Power in UK and Denmark: Can Rational Choice Help Explain Different Outcomes? , 2002 .

[8]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development , 2011 .

[9]  Claire Dwyer,et al.  Qualitative methodologies for geographers : issues and debates , 2001 .

[10]  R. Day,et al.  Fuel poverty as injustice: Integrating distribution, recognition and procedure in the struggle for affordable warmth , 2012 .

[11]  Benjamin R. Jones,et al.  Energy Security, Equality and Justice , 2013 .

[12]  D. Harvey Social Justice and the City , 2009 .

[13]  Sherilyn MacGregor,et al.  Big society, little justice? Community renewable energy and the politics of localism , 2014 .

[14]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Emotion and rationality: The characterisation and evaluation of opposition to renewable energy projects , 2009 .

[15]  K. Yenneti “Social justice and solar energy implementation”: a case study of Charanaka solar park, Gujarat, India , 2014 .

[16]  D. Schlosberg Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements And Political Theories , 2004 .

[17]  K. Shrader-Frechette Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy , 2002 .

[18]  A. Sen,et al.  The idea of justice , 2009, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[19]  L. Gilson,et al.  Putting equity in health back onto the social policy agenda: experience from South Africa. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[20]  E. Soja Seeking Spatial Justice , 2010 .

[21]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[22]  K. Bickerstaff,et al.  Energy Justice in a Changing Climate , 2013 .

[23]  James Griffin,et al.  Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. , 1987 .

[24]  J. Dryzek Deliberative democracy and beyond : liberals, critics, contestations , 2000 .

[25]  Bill Cooke,et al.  Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. , 2001 .

[26]  N. Simcock Exploring how stakeholders in two community wind projects use a “those affected” principle to evaluate the fairness of each project's spatial boundary , 2014 .

[27]  Michael Walzer,et al.  Spheres of Justice , 1983 .

[28]  S. Hall Energy justice and ethical consumption: comparison, synthesis and lesson drawing , 2013 .

[29]  M. Nussbaum Human Functioning and Social Justice , 1992 .

[30]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Community renewable energy: What should it mean , 2008 .

[31]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole,et al.  Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications , 2007 .

[32]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  The Politics of Landscape Value: A Case Study of Wind Farm Conflict in Rural Catalonia , 2009 .

[33]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  Wind Farms in Rural Areas: How Far Do Community Benefits from Wind Farms Represent a Local Economic Development Opportunity?. , 2011 .

[34]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[35]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted during Otober and November 2005 , 2006 .

[36]  M. Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. , 2007 .

[37]  Karl Mallon,et al.  Book Review: Renewable Energy Policy and Politics — A Handbook for Decision-Making , 2006 .

[38]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[39]  R. Day,et al.  Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework , 2016 .

[40]  V. Shiva,et al.  Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge , 1997 .

[41]  Sam Wong,et al.  Overcoming obstacles against effective solar lighting interventions in South Asia , 2012 .

[42]  L. Philip,et al.  Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Social Research in Human Geography—An Impossible Mixture? , 1998 .

[43]  R. Day,et al.  Procedural (in)justice in the implementation of solar energy: The case of Charanaka solar park, Gujarat, India , 2015 .

[44]  Hu Runqing,et al.  Policy analysis of the barriers to renewable energy development in the People's Republic of China , 2002 .

[45]  Alain Nadaï,et al.  “Planning”, “siting” and the local acceptance of wind power: Some lessons from the French case , 2007 .

[46]  Miranda J. Brady,et al.  Wind power! Marketing renewable energy on tribal lands and the struggle for just sustainability , 2012 .

[47]  Komali Yenneti Industry perceptions on feed in tariff (FiT) based solar power policies – A case of Gujarat, India , 2016 .